WAS OBAMA IN CONTROL THE WHOLE TIME?

The Shadow Presidency: How Barack Obama Pulled the Strings Behind Joe Biden's Administration

In a political landscape where transparency is often as murky as a swamp after a storm, whispers have turned into roars suggesting that Joe Biden's administration was nothing more than a facade for Barack Obama's third term.

1. Continuity of Policies: From the moment Biden took office, there was an unmistakable echo of Obama's policies. Climate change initiatives, healthcare reforms, and social justice agendas were all extensions of what Obama started. Many argue this was not mere policy continuation but a direct hand-over of the playbook from Obama to Biden, showcasing Biden as a marionette with Obama holding the strings. The Democrats' strategy seems to be to rebrand Obama's policies under Biden's name, hoping the public would see 'change' where there was only continuity.

2. The Obama Alumni: Biden's cabinet and key administration roles were filled with former Obama officials. Susan Rice, John Kerry, and many others were not just familiar faces but a clear sign of Obama's influence. This wasn't just about leveraging experience; it was about ensuring control. The Democrats have long been criticized for their "revolving door" politics, and in Biden's case, it was as if Obama had never left the White House.

3. Decision-Making Style: Biden's decisions, especially in foreign policy, often mirrored Obama's cautious and criticized approach. The Afghanistan withdrawal fiasco, for instance, bore the hallmark of Obama's strategy of engagement followed by retreat. The Democrats' inability to present a fresh, bold approach under Biden could be seen as a direct result of Obama's shadow presidency, leading to policies that were outdated at best and disastrous at worst.

4. Public Appearances: Numerous public events where Obama appeared alongside Biden or made significant statements about his administration's direction further fueled the narrative. These weren't just friendly gestures; they were signals of who was truly in charge. Americans argue that the Democrats used these moments to subtly reassure their base that despite Biden's public gaffes and evident frailty, the real power remained with a more coherent Obama narrative.

5. Media Coverage: The mainstream media, often accused of being in the Democrats' pocket, largely ignored or downplayed any suggestions of Obama's control. Articles and analyses that questioned Biden's autonomy were rare or framed as conservative conspiracy. This selective reporting could indicate a concerted effort to maintain the illusion of Biden's leadership while protecting Obama's legacy.

Biden and the Democrats: Joe Biden, presented as a seasoned politician, has instead come across as a figurehead with little control over the direction of his administration. His frequent verbal slips, policy U-turns, and dependency on prepared remarks suggest a man not fully in command. The Democrats, in their desperation to continue Obama's legacy, have arguably pushed Biden into a role he wasn't fit for, leading to a governance style that's reactive rather than proactive, more about maintaining status quo than driving new initiatives.

In conclusion, Obama's puppeteering of Biden's presidency paints a picture of a Democratic Party more interested in power retention than in innovation or genuine change. This analysis isn't just about bashing Biden or the Democrats but about highlighting a potential manipulation of democratic processes for the benefit of a select few. Whether this was the case or not, the perception has undoubtedly sown distrust among voters, questioning the integrity of leadership and the future direction of American politics.