HERE IS WHY WE NEED TERM LIMITS & SINGLE SUBJECT SPENDING BILLS!

In partnership with

Meet the AI tool fighting against bias and censorship: Venice.ai

Break free from biased and censored AI. Venice uses leading open-source tech to deliver unrestricted machine intelligence, while preserving your privacy. Try it now for free, or upgrade to Pro with code BEEHIIV for 20% off.

Try Venice free

IT’S TIME FOR TERM LIMITS AND SINGLE SUBJECT SPENDING!

The argument for implementing term limits in Congress centers on the belief that such measures would enhance transparency and combat generational corruption within the American political system. Proponents of this idea argue that long-serving politicians often become entrenched in the system, leading to a disconnect from the constituents they are meant to serve. Additionally, the advocacy for single-subject spending bills aims to ensure clarity and accountability in government spending, preventing the bundling of unrelated provisions which can obscure the true intent or cost of legislation.

Term Limits for Transparency and Reduced Corruption:

• Reducing Entrenchment: Long-term incumbency can lead to politicians focusing more on maintaining their position rather than on serving their constituents. Term limits would force turnover, bringing fresh perspectives and potentially aligning representatives more closely with current public needs.

• Breaking Political Dynasties: There's an argument that without term limits, politics can become a career passed down through generations or within a small circle of elites, which might lead to a lack of diversity in thought and representation. Limiting terms could democratize access to political power.

• Counteracting Corruption: While corruption isn't solely a function of long service, the longer someone stays in office, the more opportunities they have to engage in corrupt practices or to be influenced by lobbyists. Term limits could theoretically reduce this risk by preventing officials from becoming too comfortable or powerful within the system.

Single-Subject Spending Bills:

• Clarity and Accountability: By ensuring each bill addresses only one subject, lawmakers and the public can more easily understand and debate the implications of each piece of legislation. This would make it harder to hide contentious or irrelevant provisions within larger omnibus bills.

• Enhanced Public Oversight: With bills limited to single subjects, voters can more directly hold their representatives accountable for their votes on specific issues, rather than having to navigate through complex, multi-faceted legislation where their representative's stance might be obscured.

• Reducing Pork-Barrel Spending: Often, large spending bills include "pork" – projects or benefits for specific districts or states that are not necessarily in the national interest but are included to garner votes. Single-subject bills would make these additions more transparent and potentially less frequent.

America First Perspective:

Term limits and single-subject spending bills resonate with core values of limited government, accountability, and a return to the principles of the founding fathers, who feared the rise of political aristocracy.

• Sovereignty and Representation: Term limits ensure that government remains of the people, by the people, and for the people, preventing the establishment of a ruling class disconnected from everyday American life.

• Fiscal Responsibility: Single-subject bills align with fiscal conservatism by promoting more deliberate and scrutinized spending, potentially leading to a reduction in the national debt by eliminating unnecessary or politically motivated expenditures.

• Cultural and Political Renewal: Both measures could be seen as a way to renew American political culture, emphasizing merit over incumbency and clarity over complexity in legislative processes.

While these reforms would face significant political resistance due to the incumbent advantage, they are seen as vital steps towards restoring government to its intended role, serving the interests of the American people first and foremost.