IS THIS A PARDON FOR JOE OR HUNTER?!

Author

FreeVoice Media
December 02, 2024

In partnership with

KEEP FREEVOICE MEDIA FREE BY SIMPLY CLICKING THE LINK IN THE AD BELOW!

This Stock is Up 220% and Primed for the Next Breakout

Bank of America analysts predict gold will hit $3,000 by 2025 — and this hidden gold stock is set to benefit.

With gold's post-election dip, now could be a good opportunity to consider adding to your portfolio. Savvy investors understand the value of holding gold and gold stocks.

This stock has made impressive gains in recent years, and with insiders continuing to buy, it's one to keep on your watchlist.

P.S. The last gold stock we highlighted in this newsletter saw a strong rally, climbing over 60% just days after our feature. Be sure to keep this one on your watchlist!

This is a sponsored advertisement on behalf of Four Nines Gold. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk. View the full disclaimer here: https://shorturl.at/73AF8

President Joe Biden has issued a pardon for his son, Hunter Biden, covering any and all offenses from January 1, 2014, through December 1, 2024. This sweeping pardon goes beyond Hunter's personal legal issues like drug and gun charges, potentially extending to any involvement in controversial activities during this period, notably in Ukraine. The date chosen, 2014, coincides with significant geopolitical events involving Ukraine, including the U.S. political influence there, and Hunter's business dealings, especially with Metabiota, a company involved in biological research.

  1. Strategic Date Selection:

    • The selection of January 1, 2014, as the starting point for the pardon is not coincidental. This year marks the onset of U.S. involvement in Ukrainian politics, highlighted by the Maidan protests, which led to a change in government. This timing suggests an intent to cover activities that occurred during a period when Hunter Biden was heavily involved in Ukraine, particularly with Burisma Holdings and Metabiota.

  2. Implications of Ukraine Involvement:

    • Hunter Biden's role on the board of Burisma and his connections to Metabiota, which was researching pathogens in Ukraine, have been points of contention. The pardon could be seen as an effort to shield both Hunter and Joe Biden from legal scrutiny over these dealings, which many argue might have involved leveraging political influence for personal or familial gain.

  3. Broader Political Cover:

    • By pardoning Hunter for any potential crime during this timeframe, Joe Biden might be implicitly protecting himself from investigations into his own actions or decisions related to Ukraine. This includes his advocacy for the removal of the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma, which some view as a conflict of interest.

  4. Perspective:

    • This pardon is perceived as:

      • Admission of Guilt: The broad nature of the pardon can be interpreted as an implicit admission that Hunter, and by extension Joe, engaged in potentially illegal or unethical activities during this period.

      • Corruption and Favoritism: It reinforces narratives of corruption, suggesting that Biden used his presidential power to safeguard his family from legal repercussions, highlighting what many Americans see as a double standard in justice.

      • Political Strategy: The move might be analyzed as an attempt to clear the political landscape before the transition to the Trump administration, potentially removing legal hurdles that could distract or damage his legacy.

  5. Public and Legal Discourse:

    • This action has ignited debates over the limits of presidential pardons, the ethics of family members benefiting from political power, and the integrity of public office when personal interests are at play. It could also fuel further investigations or political scrutiny, especially from a Trump-led administration keen on exposing what they might claim as corruption within the Biden family.

In conclusion, this pardon by Joe Biden is viewed by conservative analysts as not just an act of familial loyalty but as a strategic move to insulate both Hunter and himself from legal consequences related to their activities in Ukraine, reflecting broader themes of influence peddling and political corruption that have been central to conservative critiques of Democratic administrations.