PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

President Joe Biden's authorization for Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range missiles to strike targets in Russia marks a dramatic shift in policy that has sparked significant concern among American circles.

• Escalation of Conflict: This move could dangerously escalate tensions with Russia, potentially leading to broader international conflict. Trump's approach has always been towards de-escalation and negotiating peace, not further military engagement.

• Timing and Political Motives: With only two months left in his term, this decision by Biden is seen as an attempt to leave a lasting mark on foreign policy, possibly undermining the incoming Trump administration's goals of ending the war swiftly.

• Strategic Misalignment: The focus should be on diplomatic solutions to end the conflict, not on expanding military actions which might prolong the war. Trump's policy has been about bringing the troops home and focusing on America's domestic priorities rather than foreign entanglements.

• National Interest vs. International Entanglement: Conservatives argue that American resources and focus should be on strengthening national defense and economic recovery, not on further involving the U.S. in foreign wars. Biden's decision is perceived as neglecting America's interests for the sake of international posturing.

This policy shift is seen as counterproductive to the peace and stability President Trump aims to achieve, indicating a stark contrast in how both administrations view America's role in global conflicts.

The recent nuclear saber-rattling by Vladimir Putin, where he announced readiness to use nuclear weapons in response to missile or UAV attacks on Russian territory, is a direct result of what many Americans view as the Biden administration's reckless foreign policy:

• Aggressive Military Support: Biden's decision to allow Ukraine to use American-supplied long-range missiles against Russian targets has directly provoked this response from Putin, escalating tensions to dangerous levels.

• Lack of Diplomatic Engagement: Rather than pursuing peace through dialogue, Biden's approach has been seen as aggressive, pushing Putin into a corner where nuclear threats seem like his only option to maintain deterrence.

• Failure to De-escalate: Conservatives argue that Biden has missed multiple opportunities to de-escalate the situation, instead choosing policies that could lead to a nuclear standoff. Trump's policy was centered around reducing such military entanglements and using economic leverage.

• Playing with Fire: The Biden administration's actions are criticized for playing into Putin's narrative of being under attack, thereby giving him a pretext to escalate the conflict with the gravest of threats, nuclear weapons.

In essence, the current administration's strategy is seen as not only failing to bring peace but also as dangerously increasing the risk of nuclear conflict, highlighting the urgent need for a return to Trump's more cautious and America-first approach.

The dismal ratings CNN faced on November 11th, marking one of the lowest viewerships among the 25-54 demographic in nearly a quarter-century, underscore a broader shift away from what many conservatives view as the legacy media's decline.

• Loss of Trust: The public has become increasingly aware of CNN's alleged biases and its role in what's seen as spreading misinformation, leading to a significant loss of trust in the network.

• Rise of Alternative Media: With the advent of conservative media outlets and social media platforms, viewers have alternatives that align more closely with their views, reducing the necessity to tune into CNN.

• Blatant Political Bias: Many believe that CNN's coverage, especially during election cycles, has shown clear partisan leanings, pushing away viewers who seek objective news reporting.

• Erosion of Credibility: The network's credibility has been questioned due to multiple instances where their reporting was later corrected or shown to be slanted, further alienating viewers.

This scenario highlights a broader trend where legacy media, including CNN, is seen as out of touch with the populace, leading to a preference for media sources perceived as more truthful and aligned with conservative values, which Trump often championed as part of his "drain the swamp" initiative.

The Pentagon's ongoing inability to account for a staggering $2.46 trillion of its assets, marking yet another failed audit, is a stark example of governmental inefficiency that conservatives argue would not be tolerated in the private sector:

• Double Standards: If an individual or a private company were to fail an audit repeatedly, they would face severe financial penalties or legal consequences, yet the Pentagon faces no such repercussions.

• Waste of Taxpayer Money: This misplacement of funds is seen as emblematic of the broader waste within federal government spending, with conservatives advocating for a drastic reduction in unnecessary military expenditure.

• Lack of Accountability: The fact that the Pentagon still receives its full budget despite these failures points to a lack of accountability in government operations, a core issue for conservative fiscal policy.

• Hope for Reform: There's optimism among some that initiatives like DOGE, potentially led by figures like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, could introduce innovative solutions and oversight to tackle such inefficiencies head-on.

This situation underscores the need for the kind of systemic change that Trump's administration aimed for, emphasizing efficiency, accountability, and cutting wasteful spending in government operations.

The complexity of the U.S. tax code, with over 70,000 pages of regulations as of 2010, represents a bureaucratic burden that many conservatives argue stifles economic growth and individual freedom.

• Simplification of Tax Code: Trump promised to simplify the tax system, reducing the burden on both individuals and businesses, which would encourage investment and personal initiative.

• Economic Boost: By cutting back on these regulations, the economy could see a significant boost through increased productivity, as businesses would no longer have to navigate an overly complex regulatory maze.

• Encouraging Entrepreneurship: Simplification would lower the barriers to starting and scaling businesses, fostering an environment ripe for innovation and job creation.

• Return to Small Government Principles: Many believe that reducing the size and scope of government through deregulation aligns with the foundational American values of liberty and personal responsibility.

Under Trump's vision, the aim was to restore efficiency to the economy, making America more competitive globally and ensuring that the fruits of economic prosperity are more accessible to the average citizen.

Grant Cardone's announcement of his potential candidacy for Governor of California as a Republican is seen by many in the conservative community as a promising development for the state:

• Business Acumen: Cardone's extensive experience in real estate and business management could bring a much-needed focus on economic revitalization and practical governance, steering away from what some view as California's deteriorating economic policies.

• Friend of Trump: His connection with former President Trump might signal an intent to implement business-friendly policies akin to those during Trump's presidency, which conservatives credit with stimulating economic growth.

• A New Direction for California: Running as a Republican in a predominantly blue state, Cardone represents a chance to introduce conservative principles like lower taxes, less regulation, and stronger law enforcement policies to address issues like homelessness, crime, and business exodus.

• Challenging the Status Quo: His candidacy could challenge the political establishment in California, offering voters an alternative to the current trajectory of social and economic policies.

Cardone's potential run is viewed as an opportunity to reset California’s direction towards more conservative, business-oriented governance, appealing to those who believe the state has strayed from the principles of economic freedom and individual responsibility.

The revelation of Kamala Harris' campaign spending, especially the $2.5 million for a town hall with Oprah and the $1.5 billion in just 15 weeks, highlights what many Americans see as mismanagement and a disconnect from fiscal responsibility:

• Excessive Spending: The campaign's lavish expenditures, like the $900,000 for ad space on Las Vegas' Sphere or the $2.6 million on private jet travel, reflect a spending spree that critics argue does not align with the economic realities faced by many Americans.

• Ineffective Use of Funds: Despite significant spending, such as the Oprah event, the campaign's investment did not translate into electoral success, losing Nevada by a narrow margin, questioning the efficacy and strategy behind such expenditures.

• Frivolous Outlays: Spending $9,000 on ice cream and $15,000 on food delivery services underscores what is perceived as a lack of frugality and an out-of-touch attitude with voter priorities during economic hardship.

• Contrast with Conservative Principles: This spending spree is often contrasted with the conservative ethos of fiscal conservatism, limited government spending, and a focus on practical, impactful use of taxpayer or campaign funds.

The critique is not just about the amounts spent but also about the strategic missteps and the apparent lack of financial oversight, which many Trump supporters and conservatives argue would not occur under a more disciplined, results-oriented campaign approach.

Speaker Mike Johnson's endorsement of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General is seen as a critical move to overhaul the Department of Justice (DOJ), particularly in light of what many view as its biased actions:

• Reform the DOJ: Johnson's support for Gaetz is based on the belief that he will bring necessary reforms to an agency accused of engaging in political lawfare against conservative figures and causes.

• End Political Prosecutions: Gaetz's potential appointment is anticipated to end what many perceive as the "weaponization" of the DOJ against political adversaries, ensuring justice is served without political bias.

• Restore Trust: By appointing someone like Gaetz, who has been vocal about these issues, there's hope to restore public trust in the justice system, emphasizing equal application of the law.

• Support Base Appreciation: This move signals to Trump's base and conservative voters that their concerns about judicial overreach are recognized and will be addressed, potentially galvanizing support for the GOP.

The backing of Gaetz by Speaker Johnson underscores a desire within conservative ranks for a DOJ that adheres strictly to the principles of justice and fairness, free from political influence.

The electrifying atmosphere at Madison Square Garden for UFC 309 was palpable as President-elect Donald Trump made his entrance, with the crowd's roar underscoring the event's significance in the conservative community:

• Celebrity Endorsements: Among the notable figures in attendance were Kid Rock, Vivek Ramaswamy, Dan Bongino, Tulsi Gabbard, and RFK Jr., each bringing their own flavor of patriotism and support for Trump's policies.

• Economic and Technological Vision: Elon Musk's presence highlighted the intersection of business, technology, and politics, signaling a future where conservative economic principles could drive innovation and prosperity.

• Cultural Resonance: Figures like Mike Tyson added a cultural dimension, symbolizing strength and resilience, attributes many conservatives associate with Trump's leadership.

• Unity and Celebration: This gathering wasn't just about watching fights; it was a celebration of American values, with attendees representing a diverse yet united front in support of Trump's return to office.

This event at "The World’s Most Famous Arena" became more than just a sports spectacle; it was a rallying moment for conservatives, showcasing a blend of entertainment, politics, and a shared vision for America's future under Trump's leadership.