PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

Under President Joe Biden's administration, there has been a concerning trend of mass pardons and commutations, with over 8,000 criminals receiving clemency. This move has raised significant questions about justice and public safety:

• Leniency on Serious Offenses: Among those pardoned are individuals convicted of some of the most heinous crimes. This includes not just minor offenses but also those incarcerated for vile acts that threaten community safety. Biden's decision to pardon these individuals en masse has been criticized as a disregard for law and order.

• Selective Justice: The pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, has sparked debates on favoritism and the misuse of presidential power. Critics argue that this selective application of justice undermines the integrity of the legal system, especially when compared to the rigorous prosecutions faced by political adversaries like Donald Trump.

• Impact on Public Safety: Pardoning thousands of criminals, many of whom were in prison for serious crimes, could potentially lead to increased crime rates or recidivism. This is particularly alarming given the current state of national security and law enforcement challenges.

Biden's extensive use of the pardon power has not only demonstrated a possible bias towards personal and political interests but also potentially compromised public safety. This situation starkly contrasts with the conservative approach to law enforcement and justice, where accountability and transparency are paramount. President Trump's administration, with a far more measured approach to clemency, exemplified a commitment to ensuring that justice serves the public interest rather than personal vendettas or political gain.

Bitcoin has recently shattered expectations by soaring past the $105,000 mark, setting a new all-time high in a remarkable display of market strength. This surge can be attributed to several key factors aligning with conservative economic principles:

• Trump's Vision for Bitcoin: President-elect Trump has hinted at utilizing Bitcoin as a U.S. reserve asset from the outset of his term, signaling a pro-crypto stance that could bolster the currency's value. His support for Bitcoin as part of a strategic national reserve reflects an innovative approach to economic policy, emphasizing self-reliance and freedom from traditional financial systems.

• Anticipated Monetary Policy Changes: The Federal Reserve's expected decision to cut interest rates next week is seen as a catalyst for Bitcoin's rise. Lower interest rates typically devalue fiat currencies, pushing investors towards assets like Bitcoin, which they perceive as a hedge against inflation and monetary debasement.

• Post-Election Market Confidence: Since Trump's election victory on November 5, Bitcoin has seen a 55% increase, demonstrating investor confidence in a more business-friendly administration. This confidence is rooted in expectations of reduced regulation and a pro-growth economic environment.

Bitcoin's ascent to over $105,000 is not just a testament to its growing acceptance but also underscores the conservative belief in free markets and limited government intervention. It highlights a shift towards recognizing cryptocurrencies as legitimate and valuable financial instruments, especially in times of economic unpredictability and expansive monetary policies. This development aligns with the conservative ethos of promoting innovation, individual financial sovereignty, and skepticism towards centralized monetary control.

Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor involved in the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump and romantically linked to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, has admitted to colluding with the White House while prosecuting Trump.

• White House Collaboration: Wade's acknowledgment of meetings with White House officials during his work on the Trump case suggests an inappropriate level of coordination between the prosecution and the Biden administration. This raises serious questions about political bias and the weaponization of the legal system against political opponents.

• Lack of Experience: Wade's confessed need to "brush up on racketeering laws" before leading the case against Trump highlights his lack of expertise in the very laws central to the prosecution. This admission undermines the credibility of the case, suggesting it might be driven more by political vendetta than legal merit.

• Conflict of Interest: The personal relationship between Willis and Wade, coupled with these revelations, points to a significant conflict of interest. Such dynamics could have influenced the decisions made in prosecuting Trump, potentially skewing justice for political gain.

These admissions from Nathan Wade not only question the fairness of the legal actions taken against Trump but also serve as a stark example of how conservative principles of justice, transparency, and accountability are undermined when legal processes are entangled with political agendas. This situation underscores the need for a robust defense against what appears to be an orchestrated effort to target political adversaries, reinforcing the conservative call for a return to impartiality in the justice system.

On Friday night, Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio, a critical hub for US Air Force operations, was forced to shut down its airspace due to unauthorized drone activity. This incident underscores the security challenges facing military installations under the current administration:

• Security Breach: The presence of unidentified drones over a highly sensitive military site like Wright Patterson, which hosts the Air Force Research Lab and other strategic units, signals a significant security breach. It raises questions about the effectiveness of current defense strategies and the protection of national interests.

• Response and Readiness: The fact that the base had to completely close its airspace for several hours highlights potential vulnerabilities in our military's readiness to counter new threats like drone incursions. This incident challenges the narrative of a robust defense system under the Biden administration.

• National Security Concerns: With drones becoming increasingly accessible and potentially weaponizable, incidents like this underscore the need for a more proactive and stringent policy on drone regulation and defense. The lack of immediate identification or neutralization of these drones points to a gap in national security measures.

In conclusion, the unauthorized drone activity over Wright Patterson Air Force Base serves as a wake-up call for the necessity of strong, conservative leadership in national defense. Under a Trump administration, there would likely be a more aggressive push for technological advancements in drone detection and defense, alongside clear, decisive policies to safeguard our military bases from such incursions, aligning with the conservative commitment to national security and military strength.

The Department of Education, under the Biden administration, has allocated a staggering $1 billion towards promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in American schools, according to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This expenditure raises several concerns for conservative advocates:

• Misallocation of Funds: At a time when American education is facing challenges with basic literacy and numeracy, the choice to spend such a vast amount on DEI programs is seen by many as a misallocation of taxpayer money. Critics argue that these funds could have been better used to directly improve academic outcomes, such as hiring more teachers or upgrading school infrastructure.

• Ideological Push Over Education: The focus on DEI, often perceived as pushing a particular ideological agenda, has been criticized for overshadowing the primary goal of education - academic excellence. This spending reflects a broader trend under the current administration of prioritizing social justice narratives over educational fundamentals.

• Questionable Impact: There's skepticism about the tangible benefits of these DEI initiatives in terms of educational improvement. Critics point out that while inclusivity is important, the effectiveness of these programs in enhancing student performance or school environments remains unproven, suggesting a need for a more results-driven approach.

The allocation of $1 billion for DEI in schools illustrates a fundamental disagreement in educational policy. Conservatives advocate for a return to the Trump administration's approach, which emphasized educational choice, merit-based systems, and accountability over what they see as divisive and potentially ineffective ideological programs. This situation underscores the conservative argument for fiscal responsibility and a focus on core educational values rather than what is perceived as social engineering.

Trump and JD Vance made a statement by inviting Daniel Penny to the Army-Navy football game this weekend, turning it into more than just a sports event but a celebration of conservative values and support for veterans. The atmosphere was charged with patriotism and camaraderie:

• Star-Studded Conservative Gathering: Alongside Trump and Vance, the suite included notable conservatives like Pete Hegseth, the incoming Defense Secretary, and Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's pick for Director of National Intelligence. Their presence underscored the unity and strength within the conservative movement.

• Celebration of Valor: Inviting Penny, who was acquitted in the controversial Jordan Neely case, was a clear signal of support for those who stand up for others, embodying the conservative ethos of law and order. His attendance was celebrated by many in attendance, reinforcing the narrative of Penny as a hero in conservative circles.

• A Platform for Patriotism: The game itself, steeped in military tradition, provided a fitting backdrop for this gathering. The crowd's warm reception to Trump and his guests was a testament to the ongoing support for his policies and leadership, especially in matters concerning the military and veterans.

In conclusion, the Army-Navy game turned into a platform for showcasing conservative solidarity, with Trump, Vance, and other key figures rallying around Penny. This event not only highlighted the conservative commitment to supporting veterans and law enforcement but also demonstrated the strong, unified front of Trump's allies as they prepare for the new administration. It truly looked like a great time, blending sports, politics, and patriotism in true conservative fashion.

In a bold move to protect national security, U.S. lawmakers have warned tech giants Apple and Google to prepare to remove TikTok from their app stores by January 19, 2025, or face massive fines. This directive underscores a conservative commitment to safeguarding American data from foreign influence:

• National Security Prioritized: The urgency to remove TikTok stems from concerns over the Chinese-owned app's potential to harvest data and spread propaganda. This action reflects the conservative stance on prioritizing national security over corporate interests or user convenience.

• Legislation Enforcement: The mandate is backed by a law passed under the Biden administration but enforced with a conservative lens, highlighting the need for tech companies to comply with U.S. legal standards regarding foreign adversary-controlled applications. This shows the conservative push for accountability and adherence to laws protecting American citizens.

• Economic Leverage: The threat of fines in the hundreds of billions serves as a significant deterrent and a display of economic leverage to ensure compliance. It showcases how conservative policymakers are willing to use financial penalties to enforce national policy, especially when it comes to national security threats.

In conclusion, this move by U.S. lawmakers to pressure Apple and Google into removing TikTok is emblematic of conservative values in action - defending national interests, enforcing strict adherence to protective legislation, and using economic tools to enforce policy. This action would likely be applauded by Trump supporters as a necessary step to counter potential espionage and influence from foreign entities, aligning with Trump's own rhetoric on securing America from external threats