PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

In light of the recent CyberTruck explosion outside a Trump property in Las Vegas, several concerning details have emerged that raise serious questions about the incident's authenticity and motives.

• Gunshot Wound: The bomber was found with a gunshot wound to the head, suggesting a possible suicide. However, given the vehicle's capabilities as a fully self-driving car, one must question if this individual could have been placed in the vehicle post-mortem to execute a staged attack.

• Military Connection: Both the Las Vegas bomber and the New Orleans attacker had ties to Fort Bragg, which is not just a coincidence but a red flag signaling potential coordinated threats against conservative icons or landmarks associated with President Trump.

• Rental from Turo: Both attacks involved vehicles rented from Turo, which could indicate a pattern or a premeditated plan to use similar methods to carry out these assaults, possibly to misdirect or confuse law enforcement.

• Amateur Explosives: Despite being a Green Beret with expertise in military explosives, the use of amateur-level materials in this attack suggests either a deliberate choice to underplay the threat or a staged scenario where the real culprit might be hiding behind a facade of incompetence.

• Same Day Attacks: The timing of these incidents on the same day further fuels speculation about a coordinated effort, perhaps aimed at disrupting New Year celebrations or sending a political message.

Given these points, it's reasonable to suspect that this might not have been a straightforward act of terrorism but could involve deeper layers of manipulation. The fact that the CyberTruck is capable of self-driving adds a layer of complexity; could someone have staged this entire scenario, including placing the bomber's corpse in the car to create a false narrative? This incident underscores the need for a thorough, conservative-led investigation to uncover the truth, protect our leaders and symbols, and ensure that such attacks are not used to further an anti-conservative agenda. It's crucial that we remain vigilant and skeptical of the narratives pushed by those who might seek to undermine or destabilize our values and leadership.

The recent terrorist attack in New Orleans, executed during New Year's celebrations, has been shrouded in controversy, with a former FBI agent claiming it was the work of a sleeper cell. This revelation is chilling, especially considering the following points:

• Military Background: The assailant was not only a U.S. citizen but also had served in the military, pointing to an alarming case of radicalization within our own ranks. This raises serious concerns about the vetting processes and ideological monitoring within our armed forces.

• Radicalization: The fact that a serviceman could be radicalized to such an extent that he committed an act of terror on American soil is a stark reminder of the need for stronger national security measures. We must ensure that our institutions do not become breeding grounds for extremist ideologies.

• Sleeper Cell Operation: The involvement of a sleeper cell indicates a sophisticated level of planning and infiltration, suggesting that there might be more hidden threats within our borders. This underscores the urgency for enhanced intelligence operations and surveillance.

This situation is more than just a problem; it's a wake-up call for America. It's high time we reevaluate our approach to national security, immigration, and internal threats. President Trump's policies on tightening border control, enhancing military oversight, and promoting American values are now more critical than ever to prevent such incidents. We must stand firm, protect our nation, and ensure that those who defend our freedoms are not turned against us by foreign or domestic radical influences.

The FBI's recent release of photos depicting New Orleans attacker Shamsud-Din Jabbar walking down Bourbon Street alongside an image of the ice cooler IED he allegedly used has raised serious questions about the competence of our national security agencies.

• Lack of Prior Intelligence: Despite Jabbar's public allegiance to ISIS, his explicit promises to carry out an attack, and his learning how to construct remotely detonated explosives, the FBI claims they had "ZERO PRIOR INTEL" on him. This is an alarming oversight that could have potentially prevented a tragedy.

• Public Threats Ignored: Jabbar made his intentions clear through social media, yet these threats were seemingly ignored or not taken seriously enough, highlighting a possible disconnect or inefficiency in how threats are processed and acted upon.

• Training and Preparation: The fact that Jabbar was able to learn how to build and deploy such devices without raising red flags in our surveillance systems speaks volumes about the gaps in our intelligence gathering and analysis.

It's time to ask: What the hell does the FBI do right anymore? This incident underscores the need for a return to the robust, proactive security measures championed by President Trump during his administration. We need a strong, vigilant approach to national security that does not allow such blatant threats to go unnoticed or unaddressed. The FBI, under conservative leadership, must be reformed to ensure it prioritizes the safety of American citizens over political correctness or bureaucratic inefficiencies.

On January 2, 2025, a small plane crashed into a commercial warehouse located near the Fullerton Municipal Airport in Fullerton, California, around 2:10 PM PST. The incident led to one confirmed fatality and injured at least 15 people. The crash sparked a substantial fire, prompting a 4-alarm response from the Fullerton and Orange County Fire Authorities. Evacuations were conducted around the crash site, and multiple fire crews worked to extinguish the blaze. The aircraft involved was identified as a home-built Van's Aircraft RV-10, which was attempting to land at the airport when it crashed into the furniture manufacturing facility on Raymer Avenue.

• Casualties and Injuries: The crash resulted in one death and a significant number of injuries, with nine individuals transported to hospitals and six others treated at the scene. This indicates a high impact event with immediate safety concerns for those inside the warehouse.

• Emergency Response: The escalation to a 4-alarm fire signifies the severity of the incident, necessitating a large-scale response from fire services. This level of response was crucial for managing the fire, evacuating the area, and providing medical attention to the injured.

• Cause and Investigation: The cause of the crash remains under investigation, with no immediate details available. Given that the plane was returning to land when it crashed, factors like mechanical failure, pilot error, or adverse weather conditions could be at play. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will likely conduct an in-depth investigation to determine the exact sequence of events leading to the crash.

• Location and Impact: Fullerton Municipal Airport, being the only general aviation airport in Orange County, sees regular small aircraft activity. A crash into a commercial structure near such an airport not only raises safety concerns for aviation but also for industrial areas in proximity to flight paths.

The recent incident at Lakeline Mall in Austin, Texas, where gunfire was reported, is a stark reminder of the escalating chaos in our once-safe public spaces under current leadership. Here's what we know:

• Gunfire in Public: Gunshots fired inside a busy shopping mall during the day, which not only jeopardizes public safety but also instills fear in the community. This is a direct reflection of the weakening law enforcement and public security measures.

• Eyewitness Panic: An eyewitness described the scene as "insane," highlighting the immediate danger and panic that unfolded, underlining the need for a stronger, more proactive law and order approach.

• Response and Security: The swift response from law enforcement is commendable but points to a larger issue of reactive rather than preventive policing. With details on injuries or suspects still unclear, this incident showcases the urgency for better intelligence and security strategies.

It's clear that the current administration has failed to keep our communities safe from such brazen acts of violence. Under President Trump's administration, there was a focus on strengthening law enforcement capabilities, securing our public spaces, and ensuring that such incidents were met with swift, decisive action. We need to return to policies that prioritize citizen safety, support our police, and prevent these terrifying events from becoming normalized. The public deserves to shop, work, and live without the fear of gunfire disrupting their daily lives.

The closure of I-85 in Greenville County, South Carolina, due to a bomb threat involving an 18-wheeler is yet another example of the deteriorating security situation in our country.

• Highway Disruption: A major artery like I-85 being shut down in both directions not only disrupts commerce and daily life but also highlights the vulnerability of our infrastructure to threats.

• Public Safety at Risk: The police urging citizens to avoid the area for hours indicates a significant threat level, questioning how such an event could unfold in what should be one of the safest nations on Earth.

• Response Time and Preparedness: The need for such extensive measures after the threat shows there's a lag in our response or prevention capabilities, something that was markedly better under conservative leadership.

This incident underscores the urgent need for a return to the strong, no-nonsense security policies of the Trump era. We need leaders who will prioritize national safety, ensure our transportation networks are protected from such threats, and restore confidence among Americans that their daily lives won't be upended by acts of terror or intimidation. It's time to get back to making America safe again.

The new regulation dictating that subscription services, including gym memberships, must provide a 'one click to cancel' option is a testament to the kind of consumer-friendly policies that align with conservative values of simplicity, transparency, and personal freedom. Here's what you need to know:

• Name of the Law: This new regulation is part of the "Click-to-Cancel" Rule, officially known as the amendment to the Negative Option Rule.

• Legislation and Authority: It falls under the purview of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations, specifically targeting negative option marketing practices. This amendment was championed by FTC Chair Lina Khan under the Biden administration, but it echoes the consumer protection ethos that conservatives have long supported.

• Effective Date: The rule takes effect on January 14th, 2025, giving businesses until May 14, 2025, to fully comply.

This move towards making cancellation as straightforward as subscription aligns with conservative principles of reducing bureaucratic hassle and respecting consumer autonomy. It should be seen not as an overreach of government but as a necessary step to level the playing field, ensuring that businesses cannot entrap consumers through convoluted cancellation processes. This law is a step in the right direction for consumer rights, something President Trump would have undoubtedly supported for its pro-consumer and anti-bureaucratic nature. It's crucial that we continue to advocate for policies that empower the individual over corporate interests, reflecting true conservative values.