FREEVOICE MEDIA - NEWSLETTER

October 25th, 2024

PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

823,000 ILLEGALS HAVE BEEN FLOWN INTO THE UNITED STATES

The Biden administration has condoned an invasion, so much so that they’ve even flown almost a million illegals in to the country at the expense of the United States taxpayer.

Open Border Policies:

  • Increased Encounters and Admissions: Under President Biden, there has been a significant increase in border encounters and admissions. The statistics indicating a quadrupling of yearly averages of border encounters compared to the Trump administration are often cited as evidence that the current policies are too lenient, encouraging illegal immigration.

  • Catch and Release: Many point to the practice of "catch and release" as a core issue, where migrants are detained and then released into the U.S. with a notice to appear in court. This policy is seen as a magnet for more illegal entries, with Americans arguing it effectively serves as an invitation for migrants, knowing they'll be released into the U.S. pending a distant court date.

Flying ILLEGALS into the U.S.:

  • Taxpayer Expense: The policy of flying undocumented illegals into the interior U.S. cities is heavily criticized. Americans argue this not only bypasses traditional border enforcement but does so at a significant cost to American taxpayers. The figure of 823,000 individuals since the policy's inception, compared to much lower numbers in previous years, is presented as an unwarranted use of public funds for what they see as facilitating illegal entry.

  • Security and Vetting Concerns: There's a strong assertion that this policy circumvents proper vetting processes. Flying in illegals poses security risks, as these individuals might not undergo the rigorous background checks typically required for legal immigration or asylum processes.

  • Political Motivation: These policies are politically motivated, aimed at altering demographic compositions in various regions, which could eventually influence voting patterns in favor of Democrats.

General Critique:

  • Contrast with Trump Policies: Trump supporters highlight the contrast with the former administration's policies, which focused on deterrence, including building a border wall, ending catch and release, and implementing the Remain in Mexico policy.

  • Cultural and Economic Impact: There's also a narrative about the broader impact on American society, including concerns over job competition, strain on public resources, and changes in community demographics, which conservatives argue are ignored or downplayed by Democrat policies.

These policies are not only neglectful of border security but actively harmful to American sovereignty, security, and economic interests.

Sponsored
The MergeMilitary tech, trends, and happenings

HILLARY CLINTON CALLS EVERY TRUMP SUPPORTER A NEO-NAZI!


The sentiment around Hillary Clinton's comments regarding Trump supporters reflects a significant point of contention in American politics.

The truth is, Hillary Clinton is a criminal.. A REAL CRIMINAL!

  • Political Polarization: Clinton's remarks labeling Trump supporters or members of MAGA as "neo-Nazis" and "fascists" on CNN, as reported on October 24, 2024, illustrate the deep polarization in U.S. politics. Such statements are criticized for exacerbating division rather than fostering dialogue. This is seen as an example of liberal elitism or disdain for conservative viewpoints, potentially alienating voters who might feel unfairly caricatured.

  • Freedom of Speech vs. Political Rhetoric: While Clinton's freedom to express her views is protected under the First Amendment, the choice of words like "neo-Nazis" and "fascists" is inflammatory. Many argue that this rhetoric does not engage with the political ideas of opponents but instead dismisses them through association with universally condemned ideologies. This can be viewed as counterproductive to democratic discourse where understanding and debate should ideally prevail.

  • Clinton's Past Controversies: Hillary has no room to talk in American politics, she lost that right 8 years ago when she deleted 30,000 subpoenaed emails. This incident from her time as Secretary of State has been used to prove her lack of integrity and adherence to legal standards.

  • Threat to Democracy: Hillary Clinton and the Democrat / Progressive movement is the real threat to democracy. Critics of Clinton might argue that her actions and statements, including those about Trump supporters, undermine democratic engagement by delegitimizing a significant portion of the electorate's views.

  • Public Reaction: Generally the American public hates this women, that is proven through the engagement numbers of her content on social media. Wherever she goes, numbers decline. No one is interested in what she has to say and no one trusts her.

A QUICK REMINDER

THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP

DON’T BE THIS TYPE OF PERSON!

TRUMP IS CONSIDERING ENDING FEDERAL INCOME TAX AND REPLACING IT WITH TARIFFS

The idea of ending federal income taxes and replacing them with tariffs can be seen as a bold move towards economic nationalism and simplification of the tax code, resonating with several core conservative principles:

Promotion of Economic Nationalism:

  • Tariffs as Protectionism: Trump's proposal aligns with economic protectionism, a stance he has championed, arguing that high tariffs would protect American industries from foreign competition, potentially revitalizing manufacturing sectors that have declined. This approach is often viewed by supporters as putting "America First" by encouraging domestic production and consumption of American-made goods.

Simplification of Tax Code:

  • Elimination of Income Tax: Conservatives often argue for simpler, less intrusive tax systems. Eliminating the income tax would be seen as a massive simplification, reducing the need for the IRS and ending what many view as an invasive form of government revenue collection. This resonates with the conservative desire for smaller government.

Shift in Tax Burden:

  • From Income to Consumption: By shifting from an income-based to a consumption-based tax system through tariffs, this policy could be portrayed as giving individuals more control over their tax burden. You pay taxes based on what you consume rather than what you earn, which could be seen as more equitable or at least more in the individual's control.

Economic Stimulus through Tax Relief:

  • Boost to Disposable Income: Without federal income taxes, Americans would immediately see an increase in their take-home pay. Many argue this would lead to greater consumer spending, investment in businesses, and overall economic growth, aligning with supply-side economics.

Trade Rebalancing:

  • Addressing Trade Deficits: Trump has often criticized trade deficits. Tariffs could be seen as a tool to not only replace lost tax revenue but also to negotiate better trade deals, reduce trade deficits, and punish countries with unfair trade practices, particularly China.

Critique of Globalism:

  • Anti-Globalist Stance: This policy would be a direct challenge to global economic integration, appealing to those who feel globalization has led to job losses and the hollowing out of American industry. It would represent a significant pushback against globalist policies, which many Americans view as detrimental to American interests.

Potential for Job Creation:

  • Manufacturing Incentive: The theory goes that with higher import costs, there would be a stronger incentive to produce goods domestically, potentially leading to job creation in sectors like manufacturing, which Trump has promised to bring back to the U.S.

Trump's tariff-centric tax policy could be celebrated as a revolutionary approach to taxation, aligning with nationalist and conservative values, aiming to protect American jobs, simplify taxes, and shift the economic power dynamics back towards the U.S.

TRUMP SAYS HE WOULD CONSIDER PARDONING HUNTER BIDEN!

Trump's consideration of pardoning Hunter Biden could be framed in several ways:

Gesture of Unity and Compassion:

  • Magnanimity in Leadership: Trump suggesting he might pardon Hunter Biden can be seen as an act of national healing and unity. By potentially pardoning the son of his political adversary, Trump could position himself as rising above partisan politics, showcasing a gesture of goodwill and compassion, which is NEVER shown by Democrats.

Strategic Political Move:

  • Highlighting Political Prosecutions: This move could serve to underline Trump's narrative that the justice system has been weaponized by Democrats against political opponents. By considering a pardon, Trump might be attempting to draw a stark contrast between his approach and what he portrays as vindictive politics by the Democrats. This paints him as the bigger person, focusing on justice rather than revenge.

  • Optics and Public Perception: From an optics perspective, this action could be seen as Trump looking out for the country's best interest by preventing what could be perceived as a politically motivated trial from further dividing the nation. Conservatives might argue this showcases Trump's commitment to moving the country forward rather than getting bogged down in partisan battles.

Criticism of Democrat Tactics:

  • Contrast in Behavior: The discussion around pardoning Hunter Biden serves as a critique of how Democrats handle their political adversaries. Many often argue that Democrats use legal challenges and investigations as tools to undermine their opponents, a tactic they claim was evident in the various investigations and impeachment efforts against Trump himself. Trump's potential pardon could be positioned as a counter to this, suggesting a moral high ground.

Analysis:

  • Public Reaction: This could reinforce Trump's image as a decisive leader who acts on principles of fairness and justice, as they see it, not party lines. However, it might also be received with mixed feelings, as some conservatives want to see accountability for Hunter Biden, viewing any pardon as letting off someone from the opposing political side too easily.

Trump's contemplation of pardoning Hunter Biden would be portrayed as an act of statesmanship and strategic political maneuvering, aimed at showcasing his magnanimity, highlighting perceived injustices by Democrats, and focusing on national healing over division.

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO THESE GREAT NEWSLETTERS!

Under the Biden Harris regime, we have money for everyone besides the American citizens. This proves that to be correct.

Sponsored
Referral BlueprintUnlocking The Power Of Word-Of-Mouth Marketing
Sponsored
Conservative FixStay informed with conservative news and insights.
Sponsored
Peak Performance DigestEmpowering men to achieve optimal health, vitality, and peak performance through expert-driven insights and science-backed strategies.

FREE SPEECH IS THE 2ND MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN THIS ELECTION!

The newfound emphasis on free speech as a pivotal election issue can be interpreted as a direct response to perceived censorship and the stifling of conservative voices across various platforms and institutions.

Summary: Recent survey data elevating free speech to the second-most important issue for Americans in the 2024 election underscores a significant shift in public concern. This reflects a growing awareness and resistance against an orchestrated attack on free speech, attributed to policies and actions by Democrats and left-leaning institutions.

Analysis:

  • Censorship Concerns: There has been a noticeable increase in censorship, particularly on social media platforms, where conservative viewpoints are allegedly shadow-banned, flagged, or outright banned. This sentiment is bolstered by posts on social platforms where users express frustration over perceived biases in content moderation, which they believe disproportionately targets conservative voices.

  • Media Trust: There's a noted distrust in traditional media among Americans, with polls indicating low trust levels. This distrust stems from a belief that media outlets are not just biased but actively participate in suppressing or misrepresenting conservative viewpoints, thereby acting as an arm of Democrat censorship efforts.

  • Cultural and Academic Institutions: Educational institutions and cultural platforms have become echo chambers for liberal ideologies, where conservative speakers are often disinvited, shouted down, or met with protests. This is seen as another front in the war against free speech, where only politically correct or left-leaning views are tolerated.

  • Legal and Political Actions: Many Americans might point to legal challenges against conservative figures, the push for hate speech laws, or the critique of the First Amendment by some on the left as evidence of an underlying agenda to limit free speech. They argue that such moves are rarely, if ever, aimed at liberal figures, suggesting a double standard.

  • The Democrat Party's Role: Democrats favor policies and regulations that, while ostensibly aimed at combating misinformation or hate speech, effectively result in censorship. The support for tech companies' content moderation policies by many Democrats is cited as tacit approval of these censorship practices.

  • Public Sentiment: The survey results are taken as proof that everyday Americans, not just conservatives, are waking up to the reality of this threat. This shift in priorities indicates a backlash against what is seen as "woke" ideology infringing upon the foundational American value of free speech.

  • Trump as a Symbol: Donald Trump has positioned himself as a bulwark against this tide of censorship. His own experiences with social media bans and the narrative around his speeches and policies being misrepresented or censored feed into this image of him as a victim of and fighter against the suppression of free speech.

The surge in concern for free speech reflects a broader cultural battle where traditional American values are at stake. The Democrat Party is the antagonist in this narrative, fostering an environment where only certain voices are allowed to flourish, thereby undermining the essence of democratic debate and freedom.

POLYMARKET STATS!

LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD

Live on X and Rumble on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday at 8pm/EST

FOUNDER OF FREEVOICE MEDIA

COUNTER POINT

JasonStandsForTruth LIVE on X at 7:30pm (PT) / 10:30pm (EST) - TUESDAYS

PRESIDENT OF FREEVOICE MEDIA