In partnership with

PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

PLEASE HELP US OUT AND QUICKLY CLICK THE LINK IN THE AD BELOW! THIS HELPS KEEP OUR NEWSLETTER FREE FOR YOU.

This Stock is Up 220% and Primed for the Next Breakout

Bank of America analysts predict gold will hit $3,000 by 2025 — and this hidden gold stock is set to benefit.

With gold's post-election dip, now could be a good opportunity to consider adding to your portfolio. Savvy investors understand the value of holding gold and gold stocks.

This stock has made impressive gains in recent years, and with insiders continuing to buy, it's one to keep on your watchlist.

Learn About This Winning Trade

P.S. The last gold stock we highlighted in this newsletter saw a strong rally, climbing over 60% just days after our feature. Be sure to keep this one on your watchlist!

This is a sponsored advertisement on behalf of Four Nines Gold. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk. View the full disclaimer here: https://shorturl.at/73AF8

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

Joe Biden's decision to pardon his son Hunter for all crimes potentially committed since January 1, 2014, raises significant questions about the motives behind selecting that specific date. This action isn't merely about overlooking Hunter's personal legal troubles; it's perceived by many as an attempt to shield both Hunter and Joe Biden from scrutiny regarding their involvement in Ukrainian affairs. This move is seen as particularly egregious given the timing aligns with critical geopolitical events, suggesting an abuse of presidential power to erase any legal repercussions from their alleged activities in Ukraine, including Hunter's associations with Metabiota and its controversial research.

• Strategic Date Selection: The choice of January 1, 2014, coincides with the U.S. involvement in Ukrainian politics, hinting at a deliberate effort to cover tracks related to this period.

• Metabiota Connection: Hunter Biden's involvement with Metabiota, which was searching for coronaviruses in Ukraine during this time, adds a layer of conspiracy regarding the motives behind the pardon.

• Personal and Political Shield: This pardon isn't just about Hunter; it's viewed as Joe Biden protecting himself from potential legal and political fallout linked to his son's business dealings.

• Implication of Corruption: The broad scope of the pardon suggests an intent to insulate the Biden family from any legal outcomes related to their international dealings, potentially including corruption or influence peddling.

• Public Outcry: This move has fueled criticism, with many seeing it as an admission of guilt and an inappropriate use of executive clemency for personal benefit, further damaging public trust in political institutions.

In a bold move that underscores his commitment to his supporters, President-elect Donald Trump has hinted at pardoning individuals involved in the January 6th events at the Capitol, following President Joe Biden's decision to pardon his son, Hunter. This statement from Trump not only highlights the perceived double standards in the justice system but also signifies his promise to rectify what many of his supporters view as an unfair persecution. His readiness to act from day one of his presidency reflects a leader intent on restoring balance to what he and his base believe has been a politically weaponized legal system.

• Immediate Action: Trump's promise to issue pardons on his first day back in office demonstrates his urgency to address what he sees as injustices against his supporters.

• Contrast with Biden: By reacting to Biden's pardon of Hunter, Trump positions himself as a president who prioritizes fairness in legal proceedings over personal gain.

• Symbol of Unity: Pardoning the J6ers would act as a symbol of unity with his voter base, reinforcing his narrative of being a champion for those who feel their voices are suppressed.

• Political Strategy: This move could consolidate his support by framing it as a correction of political vendettas, appealing to those who believe in government accountability and the rule of law.

• Legal and Political Debate: Such actions would likely ignite significant debate on the limits of presidential pardon powers and the implications for future political accountability.

The cancellation of White House press briefings for several days, coupled with President Joe Biden's departure for Africa, is a clear sign of an administration avoiding accountability. This move comes at a time when the public seeks transparency on Biden's reversal regarding the pardon of his son, Hunter, contradicting numerous past statements. This lack of engagement with the press exemplifies a pattern of evasion from the Biden administration, which Americans argue undermines democratic principles of transparency and accountability.

• Avoidance of Scrutiny: The timing of this press briefing suspension and Biden's trip coincides suspiciously with the need for explanations on critical issues like Hunter Biden's pardon.

• Broken Promises: Biden's previous assurances of not pardoning Hunter, now contradicted by his actions, raise questions about the integrity of his administration.

• Public Information Blackout: The absence of briefings means there's a deliberate halt in the flow of information from the White House, leaving many issues unaddressed.

• Contrast with Trump: This situation contrasts sharply with the Trump administration's frequent engagement with the media, regardless of the controversy, highlighting a difference in how each handles public accountability.

• Political Optics: This strategy could be perceived as an attempt to control the narrative or avoid direct confrontation with questions from the press, potentially damaging Biden's image as a transparent leader.

President-elect Donald Trump's announcement of Kash Patel as his nominee for FBI Director is a strategic move to inject a new level of professionalism and accountability into one of America's most critical law enforcement agencies. Kash Patel, known for his intelligence background and staunch support for Trump's policies, is seen as the ideal candidate to overhaul the FBI, bringing back its focus on law and order. His appointment promises to address what conservatives view as the politicization of the agency under previous leadership.

• Expertise in National Security: Patel's experience in intelligence and defense sectors makes him uniquely qualified to ensure the FBI prioritizes national security and law enforcement over political agendas.

• Commitment to Reform: Patel has advocated for significant reforms within the FBI, aiming to restore public trust by rooting out corruption and political bias.

• Pro-Trump Ally: His loyalty to Trump's vision could lead to a more aligned FBI, one that supports the administration's policies and focuses on what Trump supporters believe the FBI should be doing.

• Restoration of Integrity: Under Patel's leadership, there's an expectation that the FBI will return to its core missions of combating crime and protecting citizens without the influence of partisan politics.

• Law and Order: Patel's appointment signals a return to traditional law enforcement values, emphasizing the enforcement of laws rather than interpretations influenced by political ideologies.

President-elect Donald Trump's declaration of imposing a 100% tariff on any nation attempting to establish or support an alternative to the U.S. dollar underscores his commitment to maintaining American economic hegemony. This bold economic policy move is aimed at preserving the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency, protecting U.S. economic interests, and sending a clear message about America's dominance in global trade. It's a testament to Trump's America First policy, ensuring that other countries think twice before challenging the dollar's supremacy.

• Economic Sovereignty: By threatening high tariffs, Trump aims to safeguard the U.S. dollar's role in the global economy, promoting U.S. economic sovereignty.

• Deterrence Against De-dollarization: This tariff is a direct response to efforts by some nations, like those in the BRICS group, to reduce reliance on the dollar by creating alternative currencies.

• Protectionist Stance: Aligns with Trump's protectionist and nationalist economic policies, reinforcing his campaign promises to prioritize U.S. interests.

• Commitment to U.S. Strength: The move reflects Trump's broader strategy to assert U.S. power, ensuring that economic stability and strength are anchored in the dollar's global position.

The news of Ellen DeGeneres' UK mansion being flooded shortly after relocating due to Donald Trump's presidential win might strike some as karmic justice, reflecting the unexpected consequences of political decisions. This event not only highlights the unpredictability of nature but also serves as a metaphor for the potential unintended outcomes of fleeing political climates. It underscores the ethos of resilience that conservatives often praise, where facing one's challenges head-on, rather than escaping them, is seen as the honorable path.

• Nature's Impartiality: Floods remind us that natural disasters do not discriminate based on political affiliations, wealth, or location.

• Consequences of Choices: Moving abroad in response to political outcomes can come with its own set of challenges, unforeseen by those who choose to leave.

• Local Impact: The flooding affects not just DeGeneres but the entire community, showing that personal decisions can have broader implications.

• Resilience Over Relocation: This incident can be seen as a lesson in standing firm in one's homeland, adapting to and overcoming challenges rather than seeking refuge elsewhere.

• Political Commentary: Some might view this as a symbolic event, where even those who oppose conservative policies face their own trials, suggesting that problems aren't left behind by simply changing locations.

George Clooney's recent admission of feeling manipulated by former President Barack Obama into endorsing Kamala Harris highlights the often opaque nature of political alliances and maneuvers, especially within the so-called liberal elite circles. This revelation not only underscores the duplicity that conservatives often critique in political figures but also serves as a wake-up call for those who might have been swayed by celebrity endorsements. Clooney's earlier onstage moment with Biden and Obama, where Biden appeared to need assistance, should have been a red flag about the realities of political support and manipulation.

• Acknowledgment of Manipulation: Clooney's admission is a testament to how political figures can use influence, even over celebrities, to push agendas that might not align with their public image or values.

• Misjudgment: The incident where Obama had to physically guide Biden off stage was a missed opportunity for Clooney to reassess his political endorsements, indicating a possible lack of scrutiny or foresight.

• Political Realism: This situation brings to light the complexities of political relationships, where personal loyalties and public stances can be at odds, a notion often criticized by conservatives who advocate for transparency.

• Celebrity Influence: It questions the effectiveness and sincerity of celebrity endorsements in politics, suggesting they are often more about political maneuvering than genuine belief or conviction.