In partnership with

PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

PLEASE HELP KEEP OUR NEWSLETTER FREE BY SIMPLY CLICKING THE LINK IN THIS AD. NO NEED TO DO ANYTHING FURTHER!

Add a piece of the energy sector to your portfolio.

• Access to 300 million barrels of recoverable oil reserves

• Royalty-based investment model reducing operational risks

• Projected 25+ years of potential royalty income

Join the Raise

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

The bathroom protest on Capitol Hill, sparked by Speaker Mike Johnson's mandate to reserve women's restrooms for biological women, reflects a broader cultural clash between traditional conservative values and progressive gender ideology. This event highlights what ‘s seen as a necessary return to recognizing biological realities over self-identified gender, emphasizing the protection of women's spaces. The assertion that transgender individuals are mentally ill aligns with a conservative viewpoint that seeks to challenge what they consider to be the normalization of gender dysphoria, arguing for policies based on biological sex rather than gender identity.

• Biological Reality: Many argue that policies should be based on biological sex, not gender identity, to maintain clarity and fairness in public facilities.

• Women's Rights: This mandate is seen as defending women's privacy and safety, which conservatives argue are being compromised by transgender bathroom policies.

• Mental Health Perspective: The view that transgenderism might be associated with mental illness reflects a stance that medical diagnoses should guide policy rather than social or political pressures.

• Cultural Resistance: The protest signifies resistance to what many view as an overreach of progressive ideology into common-sense areas like restroom use.

• Trump's Policies: This event underscores Trump's and his supporters' pushback against woke culture, advocating for traditional norms.

• Public Safety: There's a concern among conservatives about the safety and comfort of women and children in public restrooms when transgender individuals are allowed access based on gender identity.

• Political Polarization: The issue further polarizes politics, with conservatives using this to rally support for can

The release of photos showing what appears to be two different individuals linked to the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson underscores the chaos and crime plaguing New York City under current leadership. This incident is emblematic of a broader crisis in urban governance, where law enforcement is perceived as ineffective, and crime rates are soaring. The apparent hit on a high-profile CEO suggests not only a failure in personal security but also hints at deeper issues of corruption or organized crime that might thrive in such an environment. This situation calls for a stringent law-and-order approach, reminiscent of Trump's tough stance on crime, to restore safety and confidence in NYC.

• Crime Epidemic: The confusion with the suspect's photos illustrates the rampant crime situation in NYC, necessitating a robust response.

• Safety for Business: A CEO's murder in broad daylight indicates that even corporate leaders are not safe, undermining business confidence in the city.

• Law Enforcement Critique: The discrepancy in suspect imagery reflects poorly on the NYPD's investigative capabilities or suggests possible infiltration or corruption.

• Need for Trump Policies: This incident could be used to advocate for Trump's policies like "stop-and-frisk" or increased police funding to combat crime.

• Targeted Killings: The possibility of this being a professional hit might raise discussions about corporate warfare or personal vendettas, calling for better protection for executives.

• Public Trust: Such high-profile crimes contribute to public distrust in the government's ability to keep its citizens safe, fueling calls for change.

• Clean-Up Initiative: There's a push for a significant initiative to clean up crime, possibly echoing Trump's past comments on urban decay and the need for urban renewal through law enforcement.

The public shouting match between USSS Director Rowe and GOP Representative Fallon over the handling of assassination attempts on Trump highlights the deep divisions and the high stakes of political security. This confrontation is a testament to the urgency of ensuring robust protection for Trump, even post-election, given the threats against him. Fallon's use of the 9/11 commemoration photo to critique Rowe's actions or inactions underscores the sentiment that sacred events should not be politicized, yet security for national figures must remain uncompromised. This incident could be seen as an example of the GOP's frustration with what they perceive as inadequate security measures for Trump, reflecting broader concerns about political bias within federal agencies.

• Security Concerns: The exchange highlights ongoing worries about the Secret Service's effectiveness in protecting Trump, even as President-elect.

• Political Bias: Conservatives might argue this incident shows potential political bias within the Secret Service, prioritizing optics over protection.

• Respect for 9/11: While Rowe's admonition against politicizing 9/11 resonates, the underlying issue of security remains paramount for conservatives.

• Accountability: The confrontation signifies a demand for accountability from federal agencies regarding the security of high-profile political figures.

• Public Perception: Such a public spat could further erode public trust in the Secret Service's impartiality and competence.

• Trump's Legacy: This incident feeds into the narrative of Trump being unfairly targeted, a theme that galvanizes his base and justifies their call for a strong, unapologetic approach to his security.

• Legislative Oversight: It might lead to calls for more rigorous congressional oversight of the Secret Service to ensure political events do not compromise security measures.

Stephen Miller's outline of Donald Trump's first 100 days in office paints a picture of decisive, transformative leadership that aligns perfectly with conservative ideals and pro-Trump sentiments. The vision of a "new golden age" through aggressive deregulation, border security, tax relief, and a return to America First policies encapsulates what many see as the path to national rejuvenation. This plan not only focuses on economic prosperity and national security but also on restoring government accountability, promising to bring back the vigor and pride that they believe defined America's past greatness.

• Energy Independence: Deregulation in the energy sector promises to boost the economy, lower prices, and enhance American energy dominance.

• Border Security: Immediate action to secure the borders and deport criminal aliens would fulfill a key Trump promise, aimed at protecting American communities.

• Global Peace: Trump's approach to international relations is framed as fostering peace, positioning the U.S. as a stabilizing force globally.

• Tax Relief: Continued tax cuts are seen as essential for economic growth, incentivizing businesses and increasing consumer spending.

• Swamp Draining: The pledge to remove "incompetent and disloyal" officials is a direct nod to Trump's campaign promise to clean up Washington.

• Government Accountability: This emphasizes a return to a government that serves the people, reducing bureaucratic overreach and enhancing transparency.

• Empowering the American Worker: Policies aimed at reducing regulatory burdens are expected to foster job creation and improve living standards, directly benefiting the American workforce.

Miller's description of Trump's first 100 days resonates deeply with the conservative and pro-Trump base, offering a blueprint for what they hope will be a restoration of traditional values, economic freedom, and strong national sovereignty.

The current state of the U.S. tax code, as highlighted by tax breaks reaching nearly $1.8 trillion in 2023, underscores a critical flaw in fiscal policy that conservatives argue needs urgent reform. The system's complexity and inefficiency not only fail to fund the nation's future adequately but also exacerbate deficits, potentially leading to economic stagnation. Donald Trump's emphasis on tax reform during his presidency aimed at simplifying the tax code, reducing these breaks, and fostering an environment conducive to economic growth aligns with conservative views that government should facilitate, not hinder, economic activity.

• Tax Code Simplicity: A simpler tax code would reduce compliance costs and increase transparency, allowing for more efficient revenue collection.

• Deficit Reduction: Cutting tax breaks could lead to a significant reduction in the federal deficit, aligning spending with revenue.

• Economic Growth: A reformed tax system could eliminate distortions that misallocate resources, thereby encouraging genuine economic growth.

• Fairness in Taxation: Reforming the code could ensure that all taxpayers are treated equitably, reducing loopholes that primarily benefit the wealthy or special interest groups.

• Encouraging Investment: By lowering corporate and individual tax rates through simplification, investment and job creation could be stimulated.

• Government Accountability: A streamlined tax code would force government to prioritize spending, promoting fiscal responsibility.

• Trump's Legacy: Continuing Trump's push for tax reform would honor his commitment to making America economically strong and competitive again by ensuring that the tax system supports rather than undermines economic objectives.

Senator John Fetterman's positive remarks towards Elon Musk, despite their political differences, highlight a conservative-friendly principle of bipartisanship where the focus is on economic prosperity over political rivalry. Fetterman's acknowledgment of Musk's contributions to the American economy underscores the pro-Trump and conservative belief that economic growth and innovation should transcend party lines. Trump's own interactions with business leaders like Musk during his presidency exemplify this ethos, encouraging collaboration for the betterment of the nation's economic future, rather than allowing political differences to stifle progress.

• Economic Contributions Over Politics: Fetterman's stance reflects a conservative appreciation for individuals who significantly contribute to the economy, regardless of their political leanings.

• Bipartisan Economic Policy: His willingness to work with Musk could be seen as an endorsement of Trump's approach to engage with the business community to spur economic growth.

• Acknowledging Success: Recognizing Musk's impact on society aligns with conservative values that celebrate individual achievement and entrepreneurial spirit.

• National Unity: Emphasizing cooperation rather than division supports the conservative narrative of uniting Americans for common economic goals.

• Innovation First: This approach prioritizes innovation and economic advancement, which are core conservative economic principles.

• Practical Governance: Fetterman's comments suggest a practical governance style that conservatives might appreciate, where effective policy-making is not hindered by partisan bickering.

• Symbolic Gesture: This can be seen as a symbolic gesture towards healing the political divide, a message resonant with Trump's call for national unity in economic progress.