PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK IN THE AD BELOW AS THIS HELPS KEEP FREEVOICE MEDIA FREE!

What We’re Searching With.

Oh, the internet. It can be a scary place… but less so with Freespoke. Freespoke is a search engine that does a few important things differently:

• News results show all sides with media biases labeled (left, middle, right)

• Their new election portal delivers unbiased election coverage so you can make up your own mind

• No adult content by default – they’re a partner in protecting your families from bad content.

Freespoke is the search platform that respects your privacy and doesn’t manipulate the information you find online.

Try searching on Freespoke, and search beyond the bias.

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

In a bold statement reflecting the urgency of national security, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul has asserted that the mysterious drones spotted over New York and New Jersey are likely Chinese spy drones. This claim underscores the growing concerns about China's espionage capabilities and their potential threat to American sovereignty. Here are some critical points to consider:

• Strategic Placement: McCaul pointed out that these drones have been observed near military installations, suggesting a deliberate attempt to gather sensitive military intelligence. This aligns with China's history of buying land close to military bases, indicating a strategic espionage agenda.

• Lack of Transparency: Despite the Biden administration's assertion that these are mostly commercial or hobbyist drones, there's a palpable distrust in their transparency, especially given the administration's past handling of foreign surveillance incidents, like the Chinese spy balloon.

• National Security at Risk: The presence of these drones could mean that vital military and civilian infrastructure are under surveillance, potentially compromising U.S. defense readiness and civilian safety.

In conclusion, this situation demands immediate and decisive action. The current administration's apparent reluctance to acknowledge or act upon these threats could be seen as a failure to prioritize American security. Under a Trump-led conservative approach, one might expect a more aggressive stance against such incursions, advocating for enhanced surveillance detection systems, stricter airspace regulations, and perhaps even direct countermeasures to neutralize these foreign threats. This event showcases the need for strong, proactive leadership to safeguard national interests against foreign espionage

Disney's recent decision to remove a transgender storyline from their upcoming Pixar series "Win or Lose" signals a potential shift back to traditional family values, recognizing the backlash against what many perceive as forced social agendas in children's entertainment. Here are some key points to consider:

• Parental Rights: Disney's acknowledgment that parents prefer to discuss complex subjects like gender identity on their own terms is a nod to conservative values that emphasize the role of parents in their children's moral and educational development.

• Financial Impact: The entertainment giant has faced significant financial losses in recent years with movies like "Lightyear" and series that push progressive narratives, leading to a box office slump. This move could be an admission that the "go woke, go broke" mantra holds true, especially in family-oriented content.

• Public Backlash: There has been considerable pushback from conservative audiences against Disney's previous attempts to integrate heavy-handed political messaging into its stories, suggesting that the company might be responding to consumer demand for less controversial, more universally appealing content.

This decision by Disney might just be the beginning of a broader recognition that entertainment, particularly for children, should prioritize storytelling and family enjoyment over divisive political agendas. It hints at a possible return to the classic Disney formula that made it a household name, potentially signaling that Disney has learned that catering to a broad audience rather than alienating part of it with polarizing content is not only good business but also respects the diverse values of its global viewership. This could be a strategic pivot towards re-establishing Disney as a family-friendly brand under a conservative lens, where Trump's "America First" philosophy finds resonance in cultural products that unite rather than divide.

Senator Elizabeth Warren's attempt to challenge Donald Trump on conflict of interest rules for Elon Musk, one of his top advisers, was met with a sharp conservative response, underscoring the ongoing cultural and political battle lines.

• Political Gamesmanship: Warren's letter was perceived by Trump's team as another instance of political maneuvering by Democrats, trying to undermine Trump's administration before it even begins. This reflects a broader conservative critique of the left's tactics to use bureaucracy and ethics concerns as weapons against political opponents.

• Response with Humor: Trump's team, through spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, responded by calling Warren "Pocahontas," a nickname Trump has used to mock Warren's past claims of Native American ancestry. This response not only dismisses the concerns but also leverages humor to belittle Warren's credibility, showcasing a strategy of countering political attacks with wit and direct confrontation.

• Ethics and Effectiveness: The conservative viewpoint here is that Warren's focus on Musk's conflict of interest is misplaced when there are larger issues at hand. Musk's role in advising on government efficiency could potentially benefit the nation by reducing waste, aligning with conservative principles of smaller, more efficient government.

This episode illustrates the stark contrast between conservative and progressive approaches to governance. While Warren tries to enforce stringent rules to possibly hinder Trump's administration, the conservative counter is to highlight the absurdity of such moves, focusing instead on the potential positive contributions of individuals like Musk. This exchange reaffirms the Trump administration's stance of not backing down from political attacks, choosing instead to confront them head-on with both policy defense and cultural commentary, echoing the "America First" ethos by prioritizing action and results over bureaucratic entanglements.

In a move that could reshape global health dynamics, Russia has announced the development of an mRNA vaccine against cancer, which they plan to distribute to patients for free.

• Healthcare Innovation: This initiative by Russia demonstrates a commitment to advancing healthcare without the bureaucratic hurdles often seen in Western countries, aligning with conservative critiques of government overreach in healthcare regulation. It showcases how innovation can lead to direct benefits for citizens without the need for extensive government programs.

• Free Market vs. Government Control: By offering the vaccine for free, Russia positions itself as providing a public good, akin to a conservative ideal where the state acts in ways that benefit its citizens directly, while still potentially maintaining a free-market approach to healthcare innovation.

• Global Leadership: This move could be seen as a strategic play to assert Russian influence in global health, echoing Trump's "America First" policy but on a different front. It's a reminder that nations can lead through scientific and medical breakthroughs, not just military or economic power.

Russia's approach to distributing a cancer vaccine free of charge resonates with conservative values by emphasizing innovation, reducing government red tape, and focusing on tangible benefits for citizens. It could serve as a model for how conservative policies might prioritize direct health benefits over bureaucratic or ideological considerations, potentially prompting a reevaluation of healthcare strategies in the West, including how Trump's administration might have approached such opportunities if still in office. This kind of initiative from Russia might challenge the narrative of who can be the global leader in public health, offering a lesson in proactive, citizen-focused policy-making.

The recent Emerson College poll revealing that 41% of young adults aged 18-29 find the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson acceptable, compared to 40% who disagree, is a stark indicator of a cultural shift among America's youth that conservatives, particularly Trump supporters, find deeply troubling.

• Moral Decay: This sentiment among the youth could suggest a significant moral decay or a disconnect from traditional values that uphold the sanctity of life and the rule of law. Conservatives often argue for the importance of these values as the backbone of society, which are seemingly being eroded.

• Education and Influence: There's a concern that the education system and social media might be influencing young minds to view violence as an acceptable response to grievances. Trump's administration emphasized "patriotic education" and reducing the influence of what they termed "radical left" ideologies in academia, aiming to counter this trend.

• Economic Frustration: While outrage against the healthcare industry is understandable, the leap to endorsing violence indicates a broader frustration with economic systems. Conservatives might argue this reflects poorly on economic policies that don't foster personal responsibility or the understanding of how capitalism benefits society, advocating instead for reforms that empower individuals rather than vilify success.

This poll serves as a wake-up call for conservative voices to re-engage with the youth, emphasizing the importance of law, order, and the ethical implications of endorsing violence as a solution to systemic issues. It underscores the need for a return to foundational American values that Trump and many conservatives championed, like respect for life, personal accountability, and the belief that change should come through democratic processes, not through acts of violence. This situation calls for a robust dialogue on how to cultivate a generation that values peace, legality, and constructive reform over chaos and destruction.

Florida's economic performance, with a 3.2% growth following Governor Ron DeSantis' stringent policies on illegal migrant labor, directly challenges the naysayers who predicted a $12.6 billion GDP loss. This outcome not only validates conservative economic strategies but also aligns with Trump's "America First" policy ethos.

• Boosting Local Economy: By focusing on legal labor, Florida has seen an increase in wages and job opportunities for American citizens, leading to more money circulating within the U.S. economy. This supports the conservative argument that prioritizing American workers benefits the nation economically.

• Reducing Remittance: Illegal immigrants often send a significant portion of their earnings back to their home countries, which does not contribute to the local or national economy. DeSantis' policies could mean more of the earned income stays in America, directly benefiting local businesses and the broader economy.

• Proving the Critics Wrong: The predicted economic downturn due to the crackdown on illegal labor did not materialize, demonstrating that strong, well-thought-out policies can lead to positive outcomes, contrary to liberal predictions. This supports the conservative belief in enforcing immigration laws to protect economic stability.

Florida's economic growth post-crackdown on illegal migrant labor is a testament to the effectiveness of conservative economic policies. It reflects the principle that when Americans earn and spend money within their own country, it creates a ripple effect of prosperity that strengthens the U.S. economy. This case study could serve as a model for national policy, reinforcing Trump's advocacy for policies that prioritize American workers and citizens, thereby fostering a robust, self-reliant economy.

In a bold move to protect national security, U.S. lawmakers have warned tech giants Apple and Google to prepare to remove TikTok from their app stores by January 19, 2025, or face massive fines. This directive underscores a conservative commitment to safeguarding American data from foreign influence:

• National Security Prioritized: The urgency to remove TikTok stems from concerns over the Chinese-owned app's potential to harvest data and spread propaganda. This action reflects the conservative stance on prioritizing national security over corporate interests or user convenience.

• Legislation Enforcement: The mandate is backed by a law passed under the Biden administration but enforced with a conservative lens, highlighting the need for tech companies to comply with U.S. legal standards regarding foreign adversary-controlled applications. This shows the conservative push for accountability and adherence to laws protecting American citizens.

• Economic Leverage: The threat of fines in the hundreds of billions serves as a significant deterrent and a display of economic leverage to ensure compliance. It showcases how conservative policymakers are willing to use financial penalties to enforce national policy, especially when it comes to national security threats.

In conclusion, this move by U.S. lawmakers to pressure Apple and Google into removing TikTok is emblematic of conservative values in action - defending national interests, enforcing strict adherence to protective legislation, and using economic tools to enforce policy. This action would likely be applauded by Trump supporters as a necessary step to counter potential espionage and influence from foreign entities, aligning with Trump's own rhetoric on securing America from external threats