PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

Today, at former President Jimmy Carter's funeral, an unexpected display of civility between political adversaries was witnessed when President-elect Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama engaged in a seemingly serious conversation. According to the New York Post, forensic lip reader Jeremy Freeman decoded their exchange, revealing a dialogue that hinted at significant undertones. Here are the key points from their conversation:

• Urgency for Privacy: Trump emphasized the need for a "quiet place" to discuss an unspecified but urgent "matter of importance," suggesting a level of confidentiality and the gravity of the issue at hand.

• Policy Retraction: Trump's mention of having "pulled out" of something due to "conditions" could indicate a strategic political maneuver or a policy reversal, showcasing his commitment to renegotiate or reconsider agreements not aligned with his administration's objectives.

• Future Commitments: The phrases "…and after, I will" and "Call me at the foy after, yep" from Trump suggest a planned follow-up, possibly indicating ongoing negotiations or discussions that require continued engagement beyond the funeral setting.

• Obama's Response: Obama's cautious yet affirmative "Can you just … it should be good" reflects a willingness to engage in this private dialogue, indicating respect for the process even if there's a history of political rivalry.

This interaction at Carter's funeral underscores Trump's proactive approach to leadership, where even in moments of national mourning, he prioritizes addressing critical issues directly. It also highlights a moment of bipartisanship or at least a recognition of the necessity for dialogue between leaders, regardless of past differences. The conversation between Trump and Obama at such a solemn event not only showcases Trump's dedication to the nation's immediate concerns but also subtly reinforces the conservative value of focusing on substantive issues over political showmanship.

Trump's engagement with Obama, underlining a need for private discussion on matters of importance, reaffirms his image as a leader who prioritizes national interests and is willing to work across the political divide when necessary, reflecting true leadership in moments both public and private.

In a shocking turn of events, Bogalusa Mayor Tyrin Truong, a 25-year-old Democrat, has been arrested in a scandal involving drug trafficking and prostitution, which underscores the need for conservative principles in leadership roles. Here's how this case highlights the virtues of conservative governance:

• Fiscal Responsibility: Truong allegedly misused taxpayer money to fund personal indulgences, renting an Airbnb for a prostitute during a mayor's conference in Atlanta. This misuse of public funds is a stark contrast to conservative values of fiscal prudence and accountability.

• Law and Order: The mayor was charged with soliciting prostitutes and buying drugs, demonstrating a blatant disregard for the law. Conservatives advocate for strict adherence to legal standards, especially from those in public office, to maintain societal order and integrity.

• Combatting Crime: The investigation revealed a broader drug trafficking network in Bogalusa, distributing harmful substances like opioids and MDMA, managed through social media. This operation not only undermines community safety but also used drug profits to buy firearms, some of which ended up with individuals barred from gun ownership or linked to violence. Conservative policies typically push for robust law enforcement and harsh penalties for drug-related crimes to dismantle such networks.

• Public Trust: Trust in public officials is crucial, and this scandal erodes that trust, particularly when public funds are involved. Conservative governance emphasizes transparency, accountability, and moral leadership, which are vital for maintaining public faith in government.

The arrest of Mayor Truong serves as a poignant reminder of why conservative values like law enforcement, fiscal responsibility, and moral leadership are essential in public office. It illustrates the potential fallout when these principles are neglected, reinforcing the conservative narrative that leadership should be about serving the public with integrity, not exploiting public resources for personal gain. This incident should galvanize support for those who advocate for a return to these conservative ideals in governance to prevent such abuses of power.

In a move that signals a refreshing shift towards bipartisanship, Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman has agreed to meet with President-elect Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago, marking a historic moment as the first sitting Democratic Senator to do so. This action reflects well on the conservative ethos of open dialogue and pragmatic governance:

• Bipartisanship: Fetterman's decision to engage directly with Trump, stating, "I think it's pretty reasonable that if the president would like to have a conversation, or invite someone to have a conversation, to have it," showcases a willingness to put aside partisan differences for the greater good. This aligns with the conservative value of working across the aisle to find common ground for the benefit of all Americans.

• Autonomy in Leadership: By declaring, "And no one is my gatekeeper," Fetterman asserts his independence from traditional party controls, echoing the conservative belief in personal accountability and the sovereignty of the individual in public service. This approach demonstrates leadership free from the constraints of party orthodoxy.

• Focus on Substance: The meeting at Mar-a-Lago could set the stage for substantive discussions on policy, potentially leading to legislative cooperation that transcends political divides. This is a hallmark of conservative governance which prioritizes results over rhetoric.

Senator Fetterman's visit to Mar-a-Lago is not just a meeting; it's a statement of intent to prioritize dialogue and cooperation over division. It's a testament to the conservative principle that leadership should be about serving the nation, not just one's political party. This event could be viewed as a microcosm of what's possible when leaders choose to engage in good faith, potentially paving the way for more collaborative efforts in the future. It's a hopeful sign that even in polarized times, there's room for unity and constructive engagement at the highest levels of government.

In a significant victory for fairness and common sense, a court has struck down President Joe Biden's radical rewrite of Title IX, which aimed to allow biological males identifying as females to compete in women's sports. This decision is a monumental win for women and girls, reaffirming conservative values of equality, merit, and biological reality:

• Protection of Women's Sports: The ruling safeguards the integrity of women's sports, ensuring that female athletes compete on a level playing field. Biological differences mean that men, on average, have physical advantages in strength, speed, and endurance, which could undermine the achievements and opportunities of female athletes if ignored.

• Recognition of Biological Reality: The court's decision acknowledges the undeniable science that sex is not just a social construct but a biological reality with implications in sports. Conservatives have consistently argued that ignoring this reality is not only scientifically dishonest but also fundamentally unfair.

• Preservation of Title IX's Original Intent: Title IX was enacted to provide equal opportunities for women in education and sports, not to blur the lines between male and female competitions. This ruling protects the spirit and letter of the law, ensuring it serves its primary purpose.

• Out of Touch with Public Sentiment: Democrats pushing for men to compete against women in sports are seen as out of touch with the majority of Americans who believe in fairness in sports. This policy would have potentially discouraged female participation, knowing they might be at a physical disadvantage, thus contradicting the very idea of gender equity.

The court's decision to strike down Biden's Title IX rewrite is a clear endorsement of conservative principles of fairness, science, and the protection of women's rights in sports. Democrats advocating for such policies appear disconnected from both biological realities and public opinion, illustrating a broader critique that their progressive policies often prioritize ideological agendas over practical, equitable, and scientifically sound solutions. This ruling not only champions women's sports but also sends a strong message about the importance of maintaining clear, fair, and biologically grounded policies in all areas of governance.

In a stark example of government inefficiency, California's failure to utilize the $7.5 billion water bond, approved by voters in 2014 for water storage projects, showcases the pitfalls of progressive governance. Here's how this situation underscores the need for conservative leadership:

• Missed Opportunities: Despite the bond's promise, not a single water storage facility has been completed in eight years. This delay means that California continues to waste vast amounts of potential water resources, with millions of gallons of fresh snowmelt and rain flowing into the Pacific Ocean. Conservative governance would prioritize swift action and accountability to ensure taxpayer money translates into tangible infrastructure.

• Environmental and Economic Waste: The inability to capture and store this water exacerbates drought conditions, threatens agriculture, and reflects poor stewardship of natural resources. Under a conservative approach, there would be a stronger emphasis on practical solutions to environmental challenges, ensuring that water, a critical resource, is managed effectively for both economic stability and environmental preservation.

• Bureaucratic Bottlenecks: The lack of progress likely stems from excessive regulation, environmental litigation, and bureaucratic red tape, which are often hallmarks of liberal policies in California. Conservatives advocate for streamlined processes, cutting through unnecessary bureaucracy to deliver results that voters expect and pay for.

• Accountability and Transparency: The handling of this bond money underlines a broader issue with transparency and accountability in government spending. A conservative approach would demand clear timelines, project milestones, and public oversight to ensure funds are used as intended, not left unspent or misallocated.

This failure to act on the 2014 water bond is a clear sign of mismanagement under progressive leadership. It highlights the urgent need for conservative principles in California, where practical, results-oriented governance could turn the tide on water management, ensuring that future investments are not only made but also completed, benefiting both the environment and the economy. This scenario is a call to action for voters to consider leadership that values efficiency, direct action, and the wise use of public funds.

The recent arson incident at the Victory Trailhead in Los Angeles, where the Kenneth Fire has ravaged nearly 1000 acres, is a grim reminder of the need for strong conservative leadership in managing public safety and law enforcement. Here's why:

• Immediate Law Enforcement Action: The swift arrest of a suspect by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) demonstrates the importance of having a proactive law enforcement presence. Conservative policies advocate for robust policing and immediate responses to criminal activities, which in this case, was crucial to identifying and apprehending the arsonist.

• Arson as a Serious Crime: The intentional setting of fires, especially in areas like Los Angeles where wildfires can have catastrophic effects, underscores the need for stringent laws and penalties for arson. Conservatives push for harsher punishments for such crimes to deter potential offenders and protect communities.

• Public Safety and Property Protection: The uncontrolled spread of the Kenneth Fire due to arson highlights the critical need for effective resource management, including firefighting capabilities and preventive measures like forest management. Conservative principles often emphasize preparedness, local control, and the prudent allocation of resources to prevent and combat such disasters.

• Community Vigilance: This incident also calls for greater community involvement in watching for suspicious activities, which aligns with conservative values of community responsibility and local governance. Encouraging citizens to be vigilant can aid in early detection and prevention of crimes like arson.

The Kenneth Fire, now confirmed to be arson, is a tragic event that illustrates the dire consequences of criminal negligence. It underscores the need for a conservative approach to law enforcement, where accountability, swift justice, and community engagement are prioritized to safeguard lives and property. This incident should serve as a wake-up call for stronger, more decisive leadership in managing both public safety and the natural environment in California.