In partnership with

PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

PLEASE HELP US OUT AND QUICKLY CLICK THE LINK IN THE AD BELOW! THIS HELPS KEEP OUR NEWSLETTER FREE FOR YOU.

The $9M Market Cap Mystery: Why We Believe This Stock is Grossly Undervalued

Bank of America Predicts Gold Will Hit $3,000 by 2025 — This Gold Stock is Just Getting Started.

As gold climbs once again, savvy investors are paying attention. This under-the-radar stock has already posted impressive gains and continues to see strong insider buying, signaling significant growth ahead.

Up 200% in recent years and primed for the next breakout, this hidden gem stock is one you don’t want to miss adding to your watchlist.

Learn About This Winning Stock

This is a sponsored advertisement on behalf of Four Nines Gold. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk. View the full disclaimer here: https://shorturl.at/73AF8

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

The recent meeting between President-elect Donald Trump and President Joe Biden at the White House marks a significant moment in American political discourse, showcasing a gesture of unity and continuity in the democratic process.

• A Commitment to American Values: Despite their past political battles, both leaders emphasized the importance of a smooth transition, highlighting the resilience of democratic traditions where power is transferred peacefully.

• A Shift in Tone: Biden's welcoming stance towards Trump, as indicated by his comments, suggests a departure from the previous animosity, potentially setting a stage for more cooperative post-election dialogue.

• Acknowledging Political Reality: Trump's acknowledgment of the often harsh nature of politics yet appreciating the "nice world today" reflects his understanding of the moment's significance beyond personal or political grudges.

• Focus on National Interest: This meeting underscores that, at critical times, national interest supersedes personal or partisan differences, aiming for an orderly transition that benefits the country.

This encounter not only serves as a testament to the enduring framework of American democracy but also potentially signals a period of reconciliation or at least, respect between political adversaries.

The FBI's raid on Shayne Coplan's home, the CEO of Polymarket, after his platform accurately predicted Donald Trump's election win, has raised significant concerns among conservatives and Trump supporters, highlighting several issues:

• Political Retribution: The timing of the raid, following a correct prediction in favor of Trump, suggests to many that it might be an act of political retribution rather than a justified legal action.

• Freedom of Expression: This move could be seen as an attempt to intimidate or suppress platforms that provide alternative sources of political analysis or prediction, potentially infringing on free market dynamics and free speech.

• Overreach of Government: Critics argue that such actions by federal agencies against private businesses, especially those forecasting political outcomes, represent an overreach of governmental power, aiming to control or influence information flow.

• Undermining Trust: By targeting a platform that successfully predicted an election outcome against mainstream expectations, the FBI risks undermining public trust in both law enforcement and the integrity of electoral processes.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between national security, law enforcement, and the protection of individual and corporate freedoms in political discourse.

The decision by Special Counsel Jack Smith to halt the appeal in the classified documents case against President-elect Donald Trump and his impending resignation before Trump's inauguration falls in line with exactly what many Americans knew would happen once Trump won the election.

• Vindication of Trump: This move can be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the case against Trump lacked the merit or legal standing to proceed, thereby vindicating Trump's stance on the matter.

• End to Political Persecution: Many see this as the cessation of what they consider to be a politically motivated witch hunt, allowing Trump to focus on governance without the shadow of legal battles.

• Restoration of Judicial Integrity: By not pursuing the case further, it's perceived as a step towards restoring the integrity of legal processes, suggesting they should not be influenced by political agendas.

• Justice Department Accountability: Jack Smith's resignation could be seen as an admission of the potential misuse of the Department of Justice's resources and a call for accountability in such high-profile political investigations.

Tulsi Gabbard's appointment as Director of National Intelligence by President-elect Donald Trump is seen as a strategic and commendable decision for several reasons:

• Military Experience: Gabbard's service in the Army National Guard, including deployment to Iraq, provides her with firsthand experience in military operations and intelligence, crucial for understanding the complexities of national security.

• Non-Interventionist Stance: Her well-known skepticism towards U.S. military engagements abroad aligns with Trump's "America First" policy, potentially leading to a more restrained and strategic approach to intelligence operations.

• Cross-Party Appeal: Having run for the Democratic presidential nomination, Gabbard brings a unique perspective that might help bridge political divides within the intelligence community, promoting a more unified national security strategy.

• Outsider Perspective: Her outsider status to the traditional Washington intelligence establishment could encourage fresh thinking and reforms within a community often criticized for its entrenched bureaucratic processes.

Gabbard's background not only ensures a robust defense of national interests but also hints at a shift towards intelligence practices that prioritize national security over international military expansion, resonating with conservative values of sovereignty and fiscal responsibility.

The appointment of Matt Gaetz as Attorney General of the United States by President-elect Donald Trump is seen as a strategic and fitting choice for several reasons:

• Legal Expertise: Gaetz, trained at the William & Mary College of Law, brings a strong legal background to the role, having served as a prosecutor in Florida, which equips him to lead the Department of Justice effectively.

• Courageous Advocacy: He has been a vocal critic of politicization within the Department of Justice, advocating for reforms to ensure it acts without partisan bias, aligning with conservative values of law and order.

• Constitutional Defender: Known for his staunch support of the Constitution, Gaetz's focus on constitutional rights and the rule of law makes him a defender of traditional American legal principles.

• Proven Loyalty and Trust: His unwavering support for Trump during his tenure in Congress suggests a level of trust and alignment with Trump's vision for the DOJ, promising a continuation of policies aimed at "dismantling criminal organizations" and restoring faith in the justice system.

This appointment is celebrated as bringing a fresh perspective to the DOJ, one that prioritizes legal integrity and the fight against what conservatives perceive as the weaponization of government agencies.

Don Lemon's decision to leave X due to criticism and lack of success post-CNN underscores a broader point about the dynamics of public discourse and the resilience needed in media:

• Intolerance for Dissent: Lemon's departure highlights a perceived intolerance for differing opinions, which contrasts with the conservative value of robust debate and free speech.

• Marketplace of Ideas: His failure to gain traction on X and other platforms since leaving CNN indicates that success in media isn't guaranteed by past affiliations but by resonating with audiences, which Lemon has struggled to do.

• Viewership Decline: The poor viewership numbers for Lemon's content since his exit from CNN suggest that his appeal was tied more to the CNN brand than to his personal draw, questioning the sustainability of certain media personalities outside their network bubble.

• Adaptation and Accountability: In a competitive media landscape, Lemon's inability to adapt his content or engage with the audience effectively reflects a broader critique of some media figures who fail to hold themselves accountable to their audience's expectations.

This situation is an example of how media personalities who thrive on echo chambers struggle when faced with the broader, more critical public sphere, emphasizing the importance of engaging with a diverse audience.

The UFO hearing held today in Congress has brought to light revelations that resonate with conservative values of transparency and national security:

• Disclosure of Secrets: The acknowledgment of recovered alien crafts and reverse engineering efforts underscores the need for transparency in government operations, which aligns with conservative principles of accountability.

• National Security: Such advanced technology, if true, could have significant implications for national defense, supporting the conservative focus on maintaining military superiority and technological advancement.

• Scientific and Economic Advancement: Exploring and possibly integrating such advanced technology could lead to breakthroughs in various fields, promoting innovation, which is often a cornerstone of conservative economic policies.

• Challenge to Conventional Narratives: This revelation challenges the established narratives, encouraging skepticism towards official stories and promoting independent thinking, a value cherished in conservative circles.

The discussion around these findings encourages a dialogue on how best to utilize such knowledge for the benefit of national interests, echoing the conservative ethos of leveraging resources for prosperity and security.