PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

The appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services by President-elect Donald Trump is seen as a decisive move to restore integrity and focus on public health:

• Combat Against Corporate Influence: RFK Jr. is known for his fierce criticism of the 'industrial food complex' and pharmaceutical giants, promising to dismantle their influence over health policy for the benefit of the public.

• Championing Transparency and Safety: His tenure is expected to prioritize transparency in health research, combat misinformation, and ensure that public health policies are based on solid scientific evidence, not corporate interests.

• Addressing Chronic Diseases: With a focus on reversing the 'chronic disease epidemic', RFK Jr.'s policies could lead to a significant overhaul in how America addresses health issues like obesity, diabetes, and autism, focusing on prevention and holistic health approaches.

• Reviving Trust in Public Health: By aiming to 'Make America Healthy Again', RFK Jr. seeks to restore public trust in health institutions, which has been eroded by perceived conflicts of interest with big industries.

This appointment reflects a commitment to placing public health above profit, aligning with conservative values of individual responsibility, well-being, and skepticism of big government and corporate overreach.

President-elect Donald Trump's choice of North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum to lead the Department of the Interior is viewed as a strong conservative move for several reasons:

• Energy Independence: Burgum's background as a proponent of expanding domestic oil and gas production aligns with Trump's agenda of achieving energy independence, reducing reliance on foreign oil, and boosting the national economy.

• Conservation with Economic Growth: His approach to conservation not only focuses on protecting the environment but also emphasizes sustainable use of resources, resonating with conservative values of balancing economic prosperity with environmental stewardship.

• State's Rights Advocate: Burgum's governance reflects a belief in state sovereignty over federal overreach, which could influence Interior policies to favor local control over public lands and natural resources.

• Proven Leadership: With his executive experience as governor, Burgum brings a track record of effective leadership, understanding the complexities of land management, and fostering economic development within the framework of conservation.

This appointment signals Trump's intent to continue his policy of deregulation, encouraging development on federal lands, and ensuring that America's natural resources are utilized in a way that benefits both the economy and the environment.

The recent controversy involving a FEMA official who was fired for directing workers to skip homes with Trump signs has sparked a significant backlash, leading to calls for a complete overhaul of the agency:

• Accountability and Integrity: The incident underscores a need for accountability within FEMA. The suggestion that officials can choose whom to assist based on political signs rather than need is a clear violation of the principle of serving all Americans equally.

• Cultural Bias: The comparison of homes with Trump signs to "vicious dogs" reveals a potential deep-seated political bias within the agency, which conservatives argue should be rooted out to restore public trust.

• Systemic Reform: There's a call for not just firing individual leaders but for a systemic reform or even dismantling of FEMA if it cannot uphold its mission without political discrimination, advocating for a return to a more localized disaster response model.

• Restoring Public Trust: The belief is that such actions by FEMA officials have deeply undermined public confidence in the agency's ability to act impartially, necessitating drastic measures to ensure that future disaster relief efforts are conducted without prejudice.

This situation has fueled discussions among Americans about the need for government agencies to remain politically neutral and serve all citizens, regardless of their political affiliations, emphasizing a fundamental realignment of how disaster relief is administered in the U.S.

The potential appointment of Lara Trump to the U.S. Senate by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to replace Marco Rubio is viewed by many Americans as an exceptionally positive development:

• Alignment with Conservative Values: Lara Trump's public persona and political activities align closely with conservative principles, particularly those espoused by Donald Trump, ensuring a continued defense of American and Floridian values in the Senate.

• Trump Legacy Continuation: Her appointment would secure a direct line to the Trump legacy, providing a voice for Trump's policies and ensuring they have representation in one of the most influential legislative bodies.

• Election Integrity Advocate: Having been vocal about election integrity, Lara could champion policies and reforms aimed at securing fair elections, resonating with a significant portion of the conservative base.

• Family and Business Defender: As an advocate for family values and having a background in business, she would likely focus on policies that support family structures and economic freedom, key tenets of conservative ideology.

This move would not only symbolize a continuation of the Trump political influence but also potentially strengthen the conservative presence in Florida's politics, ensuring that the state's and the nation's conservative values are robustly represented at the federal level.

The current administration's approach to funding Ukraine has sparked criticism among many Americans as it is utterly ridiculous, especially with Secretary of State Antony Blinken's statement on expediting aid:

• Prioritizing Foreign Interests: The focus on rapidly sending funds to Ukraine, as described by Blinken, suggests to many that domestic issues like infrastructure, healthcare, and economic recovery are being sidelined for foreign policy objectives.

• Lack of Accountability: There's a concern about the lack of oversight on how these funds are utilized, with critics questioning the transparency and effectiveness of aid distribution in Ukraine.

• Potential Misallocation: Some argue that the rush to spend money overseas before a change in administration could be perceived as an attempt to lock in policy decisions, potentially misallocating resources that could benefit Americans directly.

• Strategic Timing: The urgency to allocate funds before January 20th is seen by some as politically motivated, ensuring that policies continue despite the incoming administration's possible different approach to international aid.

This scenario has led to calls for a reevaluation of foreign aid priorities, emphasizing that American taxpayer dollars should first address domestic needs before being committed abroad, aligning with conservative principles of fiscal responsibility and national interest.

The phenomenon of the "pronoun" movement is often critiqued by Americansas an example of misguided priorities in political discourse:

• Cultural Distraction: Many view the emphasis on pronouns as a distraction from more pressing issues like economic policy, national security, and healthcare, suggesting it serves to divide rather than unite.

• Political Backlash: The backlash against this trend is seen as a contributing factor to the political losses of those who heavily promoted it, indicating that it's not in sync with the broader American electorate's concerns.

• AOC's Action as Indicative: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez removing pronouns from her X bio is interpreted as an acknowledgment of this shift, where even prominent progressive politicians understand the electoral cost of such stances.

• Rejection of Identity Politics: This move away from pronouns in political bios is celebrated as a step back from what many label as excessive identity politics, advocating for a focus on policy over personal identity markers.

The retreat from public pronoun declarations is seen as a tacit admission that such issues, while important to some, do not resonate with the wider public's priorities, aligning with a conservative critique of what they see as performative politics over substantive governance.

The suggestion from Ukraine that it might pursue nuclear capabilities if U.S. aid is cut SHOULD SOUND OFF ALARMS FOR ALL AMERICANS!

• Proliferation Concerns: The idea of Ukraine developing nuclear weapons is viewed as a step back in global efforts to reduce nuclear proliferation, potentially destabilizing international security.

• Blackmail Strategy: Some see this as a form of blackmail against the U.S., suggesting that aid should not be contingent on threats or the acquisition of nuclear weapons, which could set a dangerous precedent.

• Diplomatic Failure: The scenario underscores a failure in diplomacy where a country feels the need to resort to nuclear threats for security, rather than through alliances or conventional means.

• Call for Strategic Reassessment: There's a call among conservatives for a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine, focusing on fostering peace and stability without encouraging nuclear armament.

The conservative stance typically advocates for reducing the number of nuclear-armed states, emphasizing the need for a strategic approach that doesn't encourage nuclear proliferation but instead promotes disarmament and non-proliferation efforts.