PLEASE REMEMBER TO SUBSCRIBE FOR DAILY NEWSLETTERS SENT DIRECTLY TO YOUR EMAIL!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

Pentagon Press Secretary General Patrick Ryder confirmed that the United States military will be sending troops to the middle east.

Tensions are rising in the middle east, this is a reminder of how the Democrat party is pro war.

Another thing to consider, Kamala Harris has constantly said there are no service members in an active war zone…. She lied.

Kamala Harris's significant daily campaign spending, outpacing Donald Trump by $5 million, can be seen as an indicator of desperation rather than strength. This spending disparity might be framed as an attempt by Harris to compensate for her campaign's weaknesses, including policy failures, lack of genuine connection with voters.

Analysis:

1. Perceived Desperation: Such an enormous spending gap suggests Harris knows she's in electoral trouble. Trumps base is strong, it’s exactly what the Democrat party fears.

2. Economic Argument: This reflects poorly on Harris's fiscal responsibility, proving Trump's superiority in being a better economic manager, even in campaign finances.

3. Efficiency Over Expenditure: Trump's campaign is more efficient, emphasizing the idea that Trump connects with voters through rallies and direct communication, requiring less financial outlay to achieve the same or greater impact. Money doesn't buy voter affection or trust, suggesting that Harris's strategy might be flawed if it relies too heavily on financial firepower.

4. Media Buy and Perception: While Harris buys ads, Trump buys loyalty through policy promises and a track record that resonates with his voter base, like economic policies before the global health crisis, or his stance on law and order.

5. Voter Trust and Authenticity: No amount of money can buy the kind of authentic connection Trump claims to have with his supporters. From this angle, Harris's heavy spending could be seen as an attempt to fabricate charisma.

In conclusion, from a pro-Trump perspective, Harris's substantial campaign spending would be painted not as a sign of strength or confidence but as an acknowledgment of her campaign's weaknesses, attempting to buy what Trump gets through what his supporters see as genuine popularity and policy resonance. This spending spree could be used to reinforce Trump's image as the more grounded, fiscally responsible candidate, even in the context of campaign finance.

At tonight's rally in Pennsylvania, Donald Trump delivered an energetic and well-received speech to an amazing crowd, marking it as another testament to his enduring appeal among his supporters. The atmosphere was described as very positive, showcasing Trump's ability to connect with his voter base through a blend of personal charisma and policy discussion.

Analysis:

1. Crowd Engagement and Voter Enthusiasm:

   • The "amazing crowd" signifies strong voter enthusiasm, which is crucial for Trump as it visually and emotionally reinforces his claims of widespread support. Pennsylvania is a pivotal state in this election, this was an extremely positive showing.

2. Economic and Policy Messaging:

   • Trump's rallies typically touch on economic achievements from his term, like tax cuts, deregulation, and trade renegotiations, presenting himself as the candidate who can restore economic prosperity. Given the location in PA, a swing state with significant industrial activity, his messages likely catered to job growth, manufacturing, and energy sector support, themes that resonate well there. Also proving himself on why he is credible and the best person for the job.

3. Political Strategy and Campaign Momentum:

   • The positive reception at the rally could be portrayed as evidence of Trump's campaign gaining or maintaining momentum. Such events are not just about the immediate audience but also about creating viral moments and media content that convey strength and popularity, impacting the broader electorate. There’s no one better at this than the Trump team.

4. Rally as a Political Statement:

   • Each rally Trump holds is a statement of resilience, especially considering past events like the assassination attempt. His continued presence on the rally stage can be seen as a demonstration of defiance against political violence and a commitment to his political movement, reinforcing the facts the he will be the one to save this country from socialism.

5. Local Impact and Media Coverage:

   • Pennsylvania being a battleground state, the rally serves to solidify Trump's support base, possibly sway undecided voters, and get local media coverage which often spills over into national news, amplifying his message beyond the immediate attendees.

In summary, from a pro-Trump perspective, tonight's rally in PA was not just a gathering but a strategic event showcasing his undiminished appeal, effective political communication, and an opportunity to dominate the news cycle with images of support and enthusiasm.

There isn’t much to say. Kamala Harris has been utilizing the “basement strategy”. They will hide her because they have to. Any time she has been off script she’s sounded worse than Joe Biden. She has no excuse. This is another example on why she isn’t capable of the job.