PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

In a significant move to uphold election integrity, Speaker Mike Johnson has announced a thorough investigation into the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue, following revelations that it accepted foreign gift card donations until as late as September 2024. This investigation, spearheaded by the House Committee on Administration, is crucial in examining potential foreign influence in American elections, particularly from nations like China, Russia, Iran, and Venezuela, who might have used this loophole to funnel money into Democratic campaigns. Key points to consider include:

• Security Lapses: ActBlue's failure to block foreign gift card transactions until recently exposes a significant vulnerability in campaign finance security, highlighting the potential for foreign entities to illegally influence U.S. elections.

• Legal Implications: The acceptance of foreign contributions is not only illegal but undermines the very foundation of democratic processes by potentially allowing foreign powers to sway election outcomes.

• Transparency and Accountability: The documents acquired via subpoena underline the need for greater transparency and more stringent verification processes in political fundraising platforms to prevent such breaches of campaign finance laws.

In conclusion, this investigation into ActBlue's practices is a testament to the conservative commitment to safeguarding our electoral system from foreign interference. It reinforces the necessity for robust measures to ensure that only American voices shape American elections, preserving the integrity of our democratic process against external manipulation. This action by Speaker Johnson serves as a reminder that vigilance against foreign influence is not just necessary but imperative for maintaining the sovereignty of our electoral system.

In a recent statement, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has once again demonstrated a profound misunderstanding of American electoral choices by criticizing the U.S. for not electing Kamala Harris as president in 2024. His comments reveal a disconnect from the realities of voter priorities, focusing more on identity politics than on candidate capability:

• Voter Priorities: Americans voted based on policy and leadership, not gender. The notion that electing a woman is synonymous with "progress" belittles the complex decision-making process of the electorate, ignoring the significant policy failures and leadership issues associated with the candidate in question.

• Merit over Gender: The insistence that women's rights are "under attack" because a particular female candidate was not elected overlooks the fact that both Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Kamala Harris in 2024 were seen by many as flawed candidates due to their records, policies, and perceived effectiveness, not their gender.

• Misguided Feminism: Trudeau's claim of being a "proud feminist" in this context seems to equate feminism with electing a woman regardless of her qualifications or alignment with voter values, which is a superficial interpretation that does not serve the cause of true gender equality.

In conclusion, Trudeau's critique of American voters is both patronizing and misguided. It's vital to recognize that the choice not to elect Harris was not a referendum on women's rights but on the candidates' merits. Justin Trudeau needs to acknowledge that American voters are more concerned with effective governance and policies that align with their interests than with fulfilling a narrative of progress based solely on gender. His comments only serve to highlight the difference in political priorities between Canada and the U.S., where conservative values continue to prioritize competence and policy over identity politics.

President Trump's decision to cancel the $1 trillion F-35 contract with Lockheed Martin, as reported by the New York Post, is a bold move towards fiscal responsibility and military innovation. His conversation with Lockheed Martin's CEO underscores his commitment to cutting wasteful spending:

• Crashes and Delays: The F-35 program has been plagued by numerous crashes, significant delays, and has not met its operational milestones, posing both safety and efficiency concerns.

• Cost Overruns: With costs skyrocketing far beyond initial projections, the F-35 represents one of the most financially burdensome projects in U.S. military history, draining resources that could be better utilized elsewhere.

• Future of Warfare: Trump's advocacy for investing in unmanned aircraft reflects a forward-thinking approach, recognizing the potential of drones in modern combat scenarios, offering both cost-effectiveness and reduced risk to human life.

In conclusion, canceling the F-35 contract is a necessary step to rectify what has become a monumental example of government waste. By redirecting funds towards unmanned aerial vehicles, President Trump is not only ensuring more responsible use of taxpayer money but also positioning the U.S. military to lead in the next generation of warfare technology. It's a strategic pivot that aligns with conservative principles of efficiency, innovation, and defense readiness.

President-elect Donald Trump's invitation to Chinese President Xi Jinping to attend his inauguration on January 20th, as reported by CBS, demonstrates a pragmatic approach to international relations, emphasizing diplomacy and engagement over confrontation:

• Diplomatic Outreach: By inviting Xi Jinping, Trump is signaling a willingness to engage directly with one of the world's major powers, potentially setting a tone for constructive dialogue on trade, security, and global issues.

• Restoring American Strength: Trump's transition spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt, noted that "world leaders are lining up to meet with President Trump because they know he will soon return to power and restore peace through American strength around the globe." This suggests a return to a strong, assertive U.S. foreign policy that prioritizes national interest.

• Broadening International Relations: The mention of plans for "additional foreign dignitaries" at the inauguration reflects an intent to expand and diversify diplomatic relations, showcasing a global leadership role for the U.S. under Trump's administration.

Trump's move to invite Xi Jinping, despite previous tensions, indicates a strategic shift towards diplomacy, which is essential in navigating complex international waters. This approach aligns with conservative values of strong, yet practical, leadership on the world stage, where negotiations and personal diplomacy can lead to more favorable outcomes for the United States.

Donald Trump's scheduled appearance to ring the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange signifies not just a ceremonial gesture but a strong endorsement of his economic policies poised to rejuvenate the American economy:

• Deregulation: The Trump administration's commitment to reducing regulatory burdens is expected to invigorate businesses by cutting red tape, thereby fostering an environment conducive to growth, innovation, and increased market activity.

• Market Confidence: His presence at the NYSE is anticipated to boost investor confidence, as his policies aim at tax cuts for corporations, which historically have led to stock market surges due to higher expected earnings and reinvestment into businesses.

• Economic Growth: By advocating for policies that lessen government oversight in business operations, Trump is setting the stage for a surge in economic activities, potentially leading to a thriving job market and increased consumer spending, both critical for stock market health.

In conclusion, Trump's policies, particularly his focus on deregulation, are exactly what this country needs to thrive. By signaling a return to free-market principles, his administration is laying the groundwork for a period of economic prosperity, where the stock market can serve as a testament to the success of conservative economic strategies.

The news of FBI Director Christopher Wray's resignation, as reported by Fox News, marks a pivotal moment for restoring trust in one of America's premier law enforcement agencies. Wray's tenure has been marred by:

• Loss of Trust: Under Wray, the FBI has faced significant criticism for perceived political biases and failures in oversight, leading to a drastic decline in public confidence in the institution's impartiality and effectiveness.

• Operational Failures: From handling high-profile cases to managing internal oversight, Wray's leadership has been criticized for not addressing systemic issues that have plagued the FBI, including the controversial Mar-a-Lago raid on Trump's property.

• Need for Reform: The appointment of Kash Patel as the next FBI Director by President-elect Trump signals a commitment to overhaul and reform the FBI. Patel, with his history of advocating for transparency and fighting against the so-called "deep state," is seen as the figure to bring about necessary changes.

In conclusion, Wray's departure is not just timely but essential for the FBI to regain its footing as a non-partisan, effective law enforcement body. Kash Patel's nomination represents a beacon of hope for those who feel the FBI has strayed from its mission. His appointment could be the first step in restoring the American people's faith in the FBI, ensuring it operates with integrity and in service of the nation's best interests.