PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

In the wake of alarming calls from health "experts" urging President Biden to rush millions of Bird Flu vaccines into circulation, conservative voices across America are standing firm against what they see as an overreach by government health officials. These experts, seemingly in lockstep with a narrative that could lead to another mandated vaccination campaign, have not escaped scrutiny. Here's why many Americans, particularly those supporting conservative values, are pushing back:

• Skepticism of Government Overreach: After the experience with the Covid-19 mandates, there's a significant distrust in government directives that could infringe on personal freedoms. The idea of another forced vaccination campaign is seen as an unacceptable extension of state power into personal health decisions.

• Questioning the Experts: The timing and the urgency with which these calls are made, just days after a CNN segment on a potential new "pandemic," raise eyebrows. Many conservative thinkers question the motivations and the science behind such rapid mobilization for a vaccine against a flu strain that, to date, has not shown widespread human-to-human transmission.

• Economic and Social Stability: The mention of government shutdowns, reminiscent of the early days of the Covid-19 response, brings back memories of economic disruption and social unrest. Conservatives argue that these measures not only fail to address the root causes but also disproportionately affect small businesses and individual liberties.

• Personal Responsibility: There's a strong belief in personal responsibility over government mandates. Conservatives advocate for education and voluntary measures rather than compulsory vaccinations or lockdowns.

America is not ready to repeat the patterns of compliance seen during the Covid-19 era. The call for immediate Bird Flu vaccine distribution and potential lockdowns is met with resistance from those who value their freedoms and question the efficacy and necessity of such drastic measures. The conservative stance is clear: no more mandated vaccines, no more government shutdowns. The focus should instead be on transparency, true scientific debate, and respect for individual choice in health matters.

In a recent statement that boggles the mind, Joe Biden claimed he regrets ending his campaign for the presidency, asserting he could have beaten Donald Trump. This assertion not only reeks of delusion but also ignores the overwhelming evidence that Donald Trump was the choice of the American people:

• Public Sentiment: The 2016 election was a clear indicator of where the American public stood. Donald Trump's victory was not just a win; it was a loud and clear message against the establishment, which Biden represents. His claim of potential victory is a denial of the populist wave that swept Trump into office.

• Biden's Track Record: Biden's long political career has been marked by gaffes, policy flip-flops, and a lack of significant achievements that could rally voters. His performance in the 2020 primaries was lackluster until a last-minute surge, suggesting his appeal was far from universal or enduring.

• Underestimating the Trump Phenomenon: Biden's regret smacks of a fundamental misunderstanding of Trump's appeal. Trump connected with voters on issues like economic revitalization, immigration control, and standing up against what many perceived as the overreach of progressive policies. Biden's campaign lacked this resonance.

• Voter Turnout and Enthusiasm: Trump's campaign galvanized voters in a way that Biden's could not. The enthusiasm for Trump, even amidst all the controversy, was palpable, something Biden's campaign could not replicate or outmatch.

Joe Biden's recent comments reveal a disconnect from reality. To assert he could have beaten Trump is not just a misreading of history but an outright fantasy. Donald Trump's presidency was a response to a demand for change that no one else, certainly not Joe Biden, could have fulfilled. The American people made their choice clear, and no amount of revisionist history from Biden can alter that undeniable fact.

The recent surge in violent crimes on New York City's subways, including horrifying incidents where individuals have been lit on fire, stabbed, and shot, highlights a stark failure in leadership by Governor Kathy Hochul. With subway murders reaching an all-time high, it's clear that the state's response has been woefully inadequate:

• Violent Crimes Escalation: The subway system has become a battleground with recent shocking events like a woman being burned alive on an F train, stabbings, and shootings, underscoring a dire need for security measures that the state has not provided.

• Guardian Angels' Intervention: The return of the Guardian Angels, a volunteer safety patrol, to the NYC subways is a testament to the community stepping up where Hochul's administration has fallen short. Their willingness to patrol is not just about security; it's about restoring public confidence in a system that has become synonymous with danger.

• Criticism of State Leadership: Governor Hochul's response to these crises has been criticized for being reactive rather than proactive. Deployments of the National Guard and additional police have not stemmed the tide of violence, showing a disconnect between policy and practical safety.

• Public Outcry: There's a growing sentiment among New Yorkers that they cannot rely on the state for their safety, leading to grassroots efforts like the Guardian Angels. This reflects a broader dissatisfaction with progressive policies that seem to prioritize political correctness over public safety.

The Guardian Angels patrolling the NYC subways is a direct consequence of Governor Hochul's failure to manage the rising tide of crime effectively. As murders and violent attacks reach unprecedented levels, the citizens of New York are taking matters into their own hands, reaffirming their support for the law and order approach championed by conservative leadership like that of Donald Trump. This grassroots action speaks volumes about where the public's trust lies in ensuring their safety.

Recent allegations have surfaced regarding the Democratic Party's methods of securing endorsements, bringing into question the ethics and legality of their campaign strategies. President Trump has highlighted what he believes to be an egregious misuse of campaign funds:

• Payment for Endorsements: It's been claimed that Democrats allegedly paid millions to celebrities like Beyoncé, Oprah, and Reverend Al Sharpton for their endorsements. These payments, if true, raise serious concerns about the influence of money in politics and the potential violation of campaign finance laws.

• Lack of Transparency: The nature of these payments, described as "expenses" by some, suggests a possible attempt to obscure what should be transparent campaign finance details. The lack of disclosure on such significant transactions would be in direct violation of FEC rules which mandate the reporting of such expenditures.

• Questionable Value: The effectiveness of these celebrity endorsements in swaying voters is debatable, especially when the endorsements might come with a price tag rather than genuine support. This practice could undermine the democratic process by turning political support into a commodity.

• Broader Implications: If these allegations hold, it points to a systemic issue within one political party's strategy, potentially skewing the electoral playing field. The mention of "many others" by Trump suggests this might not be an isolated incident but part of a larger, concerning pattern.

Conclusion: The accusations against Democrats for allegedly buying celebrity endorsements with millions of dollars highlight a potential scandal that could shake the foundations of political integrity. If these claims are substantiated, it would not only be against the law but also a betrayal of voter trust, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into campaign finance practices. This situation underscores why many support a return to conservative principles that advocate for transparency, accountability, and fairness in political campaigning.

Jimmy Carter, who passed away at the age of 100, was undeniably a good man, known for his humanitarian efforts after his presidency. However, his tenure as President of the United States was marked by significant failures that label him as one of the worst leaders in American history:

• Economic Mismanagement: Carter's presidency was marred by stagflation, high unemployment, and an energy crisis, showcasing his inability to handle the economy effectively. His policies often seemed out of touch with the needs of the American people at the time.

• Foreign Policy Blunders: The Iranian hostage crisis, which lasted 444 days, was a testament to Carter's ineffective foreign policy. His administration's response was seen as weak, damaging America's standing on the world stage.

• Leadership Style: Carter's micromanagement style and perceived lack of charisma were criticized for not inspiring confidence or rallying the nation during times of crisis. His leadership was often seen as lacking the necessary decisiveness and vision.

• Legacy of Failure: Despite his personal virtues, Carter's presidency is widely regarded as one of the least successful, with his approval ratings plummeting to historic lows by the end of his term.

While Jimmy Carter will be remembered for his post-presidential work, his time in office solidifies his place as the second worst president in U.S. history, only surpassed by the failures of the Biden administration. His presidency serves as a reminder of the importance of strong, effective leadership, something Carter was unable to provide, leading to a legacy of political and economic turmoil.

President Trump has recently unleashed a scathing critique on former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy for what he describes as one of the "dumbest political decisions made in years," specifically regarding the timing of the debt ceiling negotiations. Here's why this move was seen as a colossal misstep:

• Timing the Debt Ceiling: By extending the debt ceiling into Trump's potential next term, McCarthy effectively shifted a political hot potato from Biden's administration to Trump's, should he return to office. This maneuver was not only strategically flawed but also politically damaging for Republicans.

• Lack of Foresight: McCarthy's decision to push the debt ceiling debate into the future was seen as a lack of foresight, especially since it could saddle a Republican administration with an economic crisis, giving Democrats political leverage.

• Current Speaker's Inaction: Mike Johnson, the current Speaker, has also come under fire for not addressing this issue adequately, showing a continuity of poor leadership within the GOP. His inaction suggests a failure to learn from McCarthy's mistakes.

• Political Consequences: The decision has broader implications, potentially leading to economic instability at a time when Republicans could be in power, thus affecting their ability to govern effectively and implement their agenda.

Both McCarthy and Johnson have shown a lack of strategic acumen in dealing with the debt ceiling. Trump's criticism underscores a significant lapse in Republican leadership, with both former and current Speakers failing to act in the party's and the nation's best interest. This scenario highlights why strong, decisive leadership, as exemplified by Trump, is crucial for the GOP and the country's future.

Under the leadership of President Javier Milei, Argentina has made remarkable strides in taming its once-rampant inflation, proving the efficacy of conservative economic policies:

• Inflation Reduction: Milei's administration has significantly lowered the monthly inflation rate, moving from a peak of 25.5% to a more manageable 2.7%. This demonstrates a swift and effective response to one of the nation's most pressing economic issues.

• Fiscal Discipline: By slashing government spending, reducing subsidies, and implementing broad deregulation, Milei has enforced a policy of fiscal conservatism that has led to economic stabilization and even growth, pulling Argentina out of a recession.

• Market Confidence: The response from international markets has been overwhelmingly positive, with Argentina's bonds experiencing a rally and the country's risk index hitting a five-year low, showcasing investor confidence in Milei's conservative approach.

• Real Wages and Employment: Despite initial hardships, the policies have begun to show benefits in real wages and employment rates, highlighting that while short-term pain might be necessary, the long-term gains in economic health are clear.

The significant drop in inflation rates under Milei's leadership is a testament to the effectiveness of conservative economic policies. It's a clear indicator that when governments prioritize fiscal responsibility, reduce regulatory burdens, and allow market forces to work, economies can recover and thrive. This success story from Argentina serves as a powerful example for those advocating for conservative economic principles, proving that such policies not only work but are crucial for economic recovery and prosperity.