In partnership with

PLEASE REMEMBER TO SHARE & SUBSCRIBE!

PLEASE HELP KEEP OUR NEWSLETTER FREE BY SIMPLY CLICKING THE LINK IN THIS AD. NO NEED TO DO ANYTHING FURTHER!

Meet the AI tool fighting against bias and censorship: Venice.ai

Break free from biased and censored AI. Venice uses leading open-source tech to deliver unrestricted machine intelligence, while preserving your privacy. Try it now for free, or upgrade to Pro with code BEEHIIV for 20% off.

Try Venice free

CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF LIVE WITH CHRIS’WORLD!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

The recent report of the first human death from H5N1 bird flu in Louisiana has underscored much skepticism towards government handling of health crises, particularly given the mishandling of the COVID-19 response. Here are some key points:

• Government Mismanagement: The government's approach to the COVID-19 pandemic was seen by many as overly restrictive and economically damaging, leading to significant distrust in how health emergencies are managed. This has fostered a belief among conservatives that any future response to pandemics like H5N1 would likely repeat the same mistakes if not worse.

• Vaccine Mandates and Freedom: The push for vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 era was perceived by a large segment of the conservative population as an infringement on personal freedoms. This resistance is expected to grow stronger should similar mandates be proposed for H5N1 or any other health crisis.

• Community-Based Response: Instead of top-down government solutions, many advocate for community-driven responses, emphasizing local knowledge and resilience. This approach would involve personal responsibility, voluntary community actions, and reliance on local health infrastructures rather than federal dictates.

• Economic Impact Concerns: There is a strong sentiment that lockdowns and mandates severely impact livelihoods and businesses, lessons learned from the economic fallout of the previous health crisis. The conservative stance is clear: economic stability should not be sacrificed for what might be perceived as overreactions to health threats.

Given the historical precedent set by the government's handling of the COVID-19 situation, there is a palpable reluctance among many Americans, particularly those with conservative views, to comply with any new pandemic rules or vaccine mandates. The sentiment is that the government has lost credibility in managing health crises effectively, leading to a firm stance on safeguarding personal liberties over enforced compliance. This situation with H5N1 in Louisiana only reinforces the determination to resist what is seen as government overreach into personal health decisions

The decision by Joe Biden to release 11 Yemeni terrorists from Guantánamo Bay, individuals captured in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, has sparked outrage and concern among conservatives and Trump supporters, who view this as a perilous move that undermines national security. Here are some key points:

• Security Risks: Releasing these individuals, some of whom were approved for transfer years ago but remained detained due to security concerns, is seen as a direct threat to American safety. Critics argue that this move could lead to these former detainees resuming terrorist activities, especially considering their alleged ties to Al-Qaeda.

• Political Sabotage: Many see this action as Biden's attempt to sabotage the incoming administration, potentially setting the stage for future security incidents that could be politically damaging. It's perceived as a last-minute act to leave a problematic legacy for the next administration, particularly if Donald Trump or another conservative leader takes office.

• Disregard for Victims: This release is also viewed as a slap in the face to the victims of 9/11 and their families, who have long advocated for justice and accountability. The decision to free these detainees without trial or charge after holding them for over two decades suggests a lack of commitment to justice and national security.

• Erosion of Trust: The move further erodes trust in the current administration's foreign and domestic policy decisions, especially when it comes to handling terrorism and national security. It reinforces the narrative that the Biden administration prioritizes political ideology over American safety.

Releasing these terrorists from Guantánamo Bay is not just a policy decision but is seen by conservatives as Biden's final act of recklessness. It's interpreted as an attempt to leave America more vulnerable, reflecting a broader pattern of decisions that many believe have compromised U.S. security and stability. This action will likely be remembered as part of Biden's legacy of weakening America's stance on terrorism, further fueling the call for strong, conservative leadership to restore and uphold national security measures.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's recent statements about Donald Trump's potential to end the war in Ukraine underscore Trump's unique leadership and international influence, which is often celebrated by conservatives. Here are key points highlighting this perspective:

• Trump's Unmatched Influence: Zelensky's acknowledgment that European leaders are keenly interested in his discussions with Trump illustrates the former President's significant sway in global politics. This respect from foreign dignitaries shows Trump's ability to command attention and respect on the international stage, something conservatives argue was lacking in subsequent administrations.

• Effective Diplomacy: Trump's direct approach and his reputation for negotiating "deals" are seen as assets in resolving complex conflicts like the one in Ukraine. His business background and "America First" policy are believed to push for solutions that not only benefit the U.S. but also stabilize regions like Eastern Europe.

• Proactive Leadership: Unlike the perceived hesitancy of other leaders, Trump's bold and sometimes unpredictable style is thought to be exactly what's needed to bring Russia and Ukraine to the negotiating table. His promise to end the war "in a day" resonates with those who believe in decisive leadership.

• Restoration of U.S. Prestige: Conservatives argue that under Trump, America was seen as a strong leader in global affairs. Zelensky's comments are viewed as evidence of this, suggesting that Trump's return could reinvigorate U.S. influence in peace-making efforts.

Zelensky's endorsement of Trump's potential to end the war in Ukraine serves as a testament to Trump's unmatched influence and leadership in international diplomacy. For conservatives, this is not just about ending a conflict but about restoring America's position as a superpower where its leaders are not just participants but pivotal figures in shaping global stability. Trump's return to office is seen as a beacon of hope for not just Ukraine but for global peace, reflecting his unique brand of leadership that commands respect and drives results.

The resignation of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau marks the end of what many conservatives view as a disastrous nine-year tenure characterized by progressive policies that have led to widespread pain and suffering across Canada. Here are the key points:

• Economic Struggles: Under Trudeau's leadership, Canada has seen an alarming rise in inflation and housing costs, making life increasingly unaffordable for average Canadians. His carbon tax and other environmental policies are often blamed for these economic woes, exacerbating financial strain on families and businesses.

• Social Division: Trudeau's push for progressive ideologies, including his handling of indigenous issues, immigration, and multiculturalism, has been criticized for creating more division than unity. His "woke" policies are seen by many as out of touch with the values and needs of traditional Canadian communities, leading to cultural and social discord.

• Security and Sovereignty: His approach to national security, particularly his soft stance on international relations with countries like China and his handling of the truckers' protest, has been perceived as weakening Canada's sovereignty and security. Conservatives argue this has left Canada more vulnerable both economically and geopolitically.

• Ineffective Governance: The constant ethical scandals, from the SNC-Lavalin affair to the WE Charity debacle, have painted a picture of a government more focused on image than on effective governance. This has led to widespread disillusionment with Trudeau's administration.

Trudeau's resignation is seen by conservatives as a chance for Canada to heal from the wounds of progressive overreach. His departure is hoped to pave the way for a return to conservative principles that prioritize economic stability, national security, and traditional values. The sentiment among many is that Canada can now begin to recover from the "most painful nine years" under a leadership that they believe fundamentally misunderstood and mismanaged the country's needs.

The Republican Congress's decision to hear a bill banning transgender athletes from competing in women's sports is a move towards rectifying what many conservatives see as an absurd and dangerous trend. Here are the key points:

• Protecting Women's Sports: The essence of women's sports is to provide a level playing field for female athletes, which is undermined when biological males, who often have physical advantages, compete against them. It's not just about fairness; it's about preserving opportunities for women in athletics.

• Biological Reality: The push to allow transgender women (biological males) to compete in women's sports dismisses fundamental biological differences between men and women. Muscle mass, bone density, and other physical traits give men an unfair advantage, making the very concept of transgender participation in women's sports a mockery of science and fairness.

• Cultural Sickness: The transgender movement, particularly in sports, is viewed by some as a symptom of broader cultural issues where reality, biology, and common sense are being sacrificed at the altar of progressive ideology. This is seen as not just a policy issue but a cultural one, where the normalization of transgenderism is perceived as a departure from traditional values and norms.

• Legislative Action is Necessary: The fact that such a bill needs to be heard in Congress at all is indicative of how far societal norms have shifted. Conservatives argue that without legislative intervention, women's sports will continue to be devalued and compromised.

The mere discussion of transgender participation in women's sports is seen as a sign of how deeply progressive ideology has infiltrated our institutions, to the point where basic biological truths are debated. The Republican-led bill is a necessary step to halt this trend, protecting the integrity of women's sports and reinforcing the reality that men, regardless of how they identify, do not belong in women's sports. This legislative action is crucial in stopping what many see as a cultural sickness that threatens the very essence of fairness and biological truth in athletics.

The official certification of Donald Trump's win in the 2024 Presidential Election marks a pivotal moment for America, promising healing and a return to strength under conservative leadership. Here are the key points:

• Restoration of Trust: Trump's victory is seen as a restoration of faith in the electoral process and governance, after years of what many conservatives view as mismanagement and deceit. His return is anticipated to bring back transparency and accountability to government operations.

• Economic Revival: Under Trump's previous term, the economy saw significant growth, and his policies are expected to reignite economic prosperity. His focus on deregulation, tax cuts, and America-First trade policies are believed to bolster industries, create jobs, and increase wages, healing the economic wounds of recent years.

• National Security and Border Control: Trump's strong stance on border security and his "America First" foreign policy are seen as critical in strengthening national defense and ensuring the safety of Americans. His policies aim to curb illegal immigration and combat threats from abroad, providing a sense of security and national pride.

• Cultural Reset: Trump's return is also viewed as a cultural reset, pushing back against what conservatives see as the excesses of progressive policies. His administration is expected to champion traditional American values, religious freedoms, and the protection of individual rights against what is often perceived as overreaching government mandates.

With Trump's 2024 election win certified, America is poised for a period of healing and strength. The nation has the opportunity to move beyond the divisiveness and policy failures of recent years, embracing a leadership style that prioritizes economic prosperity, security, and cultural integrity. This moment signals not just a political change but a reaffirmation of the conservative principles that many believe are essential for America's recovery and future success.

Four years ago, the voices of millions resonated across the nation, demanding change, and many paid a steep price for standing up for what they believed in—remember them. Today, as Kamala Harris presides over the certification of President Trump's election, it's a poignant reminder of the resilience and determination of the conservative movement. Here are the key points:

• Sacrifice for Freedom: The events of four years ago remind us of the sacrifices made by those who challenged the status quo, facing legal repercussions and societal ostracism. Their actions were a testament to their belief in American ideals and the fight against what they saw as electoral manipulation.

• Symbolic Victory: Harris's role in certifying Trump's victory, despite her own political defeat, symbolizes the democratic process's endurance. It's a moment of vindication for conservatives who see this as proof that their voices and votes can overcome even the most entrenched opposition.

• Perseverance: This historic moment serves as a rallying cry for conservatives to never give up. The journey to this point has been fraught with challenges, but the certification of Trump's win signifies that perseverance can lead to triumph, no matter the odds.

• Unity and Healing: While the certification might be bitter for some, it's an opportunity for national healing. Trump's return to office is seen as a chance to unify the country under conservative principles that many feel have been sidelined.

Conclusion: Today's certification is not just a procedural formality; it's a landmark in the ongoing struggle for conservative values. It's a testament to those who've fought, often at great personal cost, to ensure their voices are heard. As Harris oversees this process, let it be a reminder to never give up on the principles that make America great. The fight for freedom, justice, and traditional American values continues, stronger than ever.