In partnership with

PLEASE REMEMBER TO SUBSCRIBE FOR DAILY NEWSLETTERS SENT DIRECTLY TO YOUR EMAIL!

WE FILTER NEWS SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO BECAUSE FACTS AND TRUTH MATTER!

Mayor Eric Adams has been indicted by the federal government however the indictment is currently sealed. This comes as no surprise to many. Ask anyone from NYC, they’ll tell you how bad the city has gotten in the past few years. This is a prime example of the old saying”elections have consequences.”

Analysis on Impact and Perception:

• Public Trust: Adams' indictment is a significant blow to public trust in city governance, as if it wasn’t already and. For a mayor who campaigned on a platform of law and order, being indicted not only undermines his personal credibility but also casts a shadow over his administration's integrity. This situation adds to the perception that Adams is a disgrace, especially among constituents who expected him to uphold the law, given his background as a police captain.

• City Management and Morale: The ongoing legal battle will of course distract Adams from his mayoral duties, potentially leading to even worse of a leadership vacuum or, at the very least, a decrease in morale among city officials and employees. A mayor under investigation might struggle to push through policies or reforms, as his political capital diminishes.

• Political Fallout: Politically, this situation could be seen as a betrayal of the voters' trust. Adams' promise to tackle crime and corruption now rings hollow to many, potentially leading to widespread disillusionment with not just Adams but the broader political system in NYC. His situation might be exploited by political opponents to argue for a change in leadership or even systemic reform.

This cannabis startup pioneered “rapid onset” gummies

Most people prefer to smoke cannabis but that isn’t an option if you’re at work or in public.

That’s why we were so excited when we found out about Mood’s new Rapid Onset THC Gummies. They can take effect in as little as 5 minutes without the need for a lighter, lingering smells or any coughing.

Nobody will ever know you’re enjoying some THC.

We recommend you try them out because they offer a 100% money-back guarantee. And for a limited time, you can receive 20% off with code FIRST20.

Shop Now

Viewers and critics who tuned into "The View" this morning expecting to see a robust defense of Biden's policies (though there shouldn’t be many) or a clear articulation of his future role in politics were left disappointed. Biden proved exactly why he needs to step down, mumbling his way through the whole interview.

• Public Perception: The public isn’t confident in Joe Biden, this doesn’t help. One might wonder, why anyone allows him to go into public like this.

• Political Impact: This weakens his position within his own party, reassuring that he is a lame-duck president. The sad part is, Kamala Harris covers up for this.

• Media and Public Discourse: Biden's struggle to articulate thoughts clearly on a platform like "The View," which is generally considered friendly territory once again proves his inability to be president. The question becomes, how long has it been this bad? How long were they able to cover this up? How knew about this?

• Voter Sentiment: For undecided or swing voters, this could sway opinions negatively, not because of policy disagreements but due to concerns over competency. Voters aren’t stupid, they know Kamala Harris covered up Joe Bidens inability to do the job.

Recent events involving Ryan Routh, who was arrested for an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, have raised critical security concerns. Routh, a man with a complex political background and insane Ukraine enthusiast, had in his possession a detailed list of dates and venues for Trump's appearances. This level of detailed scheduling information has sparked worries about the integrity of the security apparatus protecting the former President.

Analysis:

The fact that Routh had access to Trump's schedule is alarming and points to several potential security lapses:

1. Information Leakage: The core concern here is how such sensitive information became accessible to Routh. Given the nature of presidential security, schedules are highly classified. The existence of a mole within the Secret Service or associated staff could be one explanation. This scenario suggests an insider with access to Trump's itinerary might be leaking information, either intentionally or through negligence.

2. Digital Security Vulnerabilities: Another angle to consider is cyber security. If Routh or his associates had hacking capabilities or if there was a breach in the digital security systems where this information is stored, it would indicate a different kind of threat where physical security is bypassed through digital means.

3. Call for Investigation: There's a clear demand for a thorough investigation not just into Routh's sources but into the overall security framework around high-profile figures. This incident proves the necessity for tighter, perhaps even more secretive, security measures around Trump.

Speaker Mike Johnson has caved again, following the House's passage of a Continuing Resolution (CR) that extends government funding under patterns similar to those established during Nancy Pelosi's tenure as Speaker, without incorporating the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. This decision is reckless and validates the lack of seriousness congress has regarding election integrity.

• Political Strategy and Party Disunity: Johnson's decision to push forward with a CR without the SAVE Act is a capitulation to Democratic demands, highlighting a lack of unity and resolve within the GOP. Johnson has been labeled as "weak" and "spineless," suggesting that his actions reflect a broader issue of Republican leadership bending to Democratic pressures rather than fighting for conservative principles, particularly on issues like election integrity.

• Election Integrity Concerns: The exclusion of the SAVE Act, which aimed to require proof of citizenship for voter registration, has stoked fears among Johnson's detractors that this would pave the way for noncitizens to influence the upcoming election.

• Spending and Fiscal Responsibility: From a fiscal conservative perspective, passing a CR that maintains or resembles Pelosi-era spending levels is seen as a betrayal of Republican values of fiscal responsibility. Johnson, by not fighting harder to cut spending or at least to include conservative policy riders like the SAVE Act, has missed an opportunity to leverage the budget process for policy gains.

• Public and Political Perception: Johnson's maneuver has led to significant public and political outcry, particularly among the base that expected him to stand firm against what they perceive as Democrat-driven agendas. Unfortunately, he has proven to be another let down.

When Kamala Harris does any “solo” interviews, it’s really a testimony to her lack of intelligence. It’s not mean, this is simply fact. Watch some clips of her most recent interview on MSNC with Stephanie Ruhle, it’s a complete embarrassment.

Stephanie Ruhle: "If you can't raise corporate taxes or if GOP takes control of the Senate, where do you get the money to do that?"

Harris: "Well, but we're gonna have to raise corporate taxes and we're gonna have to raise, we're gonna have to make sure that the biggest corporations and billionaires pay their fair share. That's just it. It's about paying their fair share."